[nasr] Re: 回复: Re: Secure Routing Path Consideration- China Mobile-ietf120

[Meiling Chen <[e-mail]>]

Indeed, after considering the example mentioned by Mic, 
Terrestrial boundary is not the only determining attribute, need more properties for real no go abroad, right?

Best,
Meiling
 
From: Michael Richardson
Date: 2024-08-05 03:13
To: =?UTF-8?B?5YiY6bmP6L6J?=; [e-mail]
Subject: [nasr] Re: 回复: Re: Secure Routing Path Consideration- China Mobile-ietf120
 
I don't see anything in your summary of GDPR that says that encrypted PII can
not cross another territory.
 
At each end the GDPR clearly applies, but for example, I see nothing in your
description that prevents data from Geneva to Bern (both in Switzerland) from
travelling on fiber to the south of Lake Geneva/Leman.  That is, through
France. (is that a better route for fiber? Probably not. But a redundant
microwave link from mountain to mountain would make a lot of sense)
(Or: Zagreb to Bucharest, both EU countries, via Belgrade)
Does GDPR really apply here?
 
I'm sure such edicts exist, but if GDPR mandates this, it would be best to have
a very specific clause referenced.
 
--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     [e-mail]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [