Re: [NAT] the future of the NAT working group
Kuniaki Kondo <kuniaki@iij.ad.jp> Mon, 22 October 2001 02:09 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA20570; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:09:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA27191; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA27172 for <nat@ns.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:01:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mgo.iij.ad.jp (root@mgo.iij.ad.jp [202.232.15.6]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA20510 for <nat@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:01:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.iij.ad.jp (ns.iij.ad.jp [192.168.2.8]) by mgo.iij.ad.jp (8.8.8/MGO1.0) with ESMTP id LAA19084; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:01:39 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zeus (h188n005.iij.ad.jp [192.168.5.188]) by ns.iij.ad.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl7) with ESMTP id LAA27434; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:01:39 +0900 (JST)
To: sob@harvard.edu, matt.holdrege@verizon.net, nat@ietf.org, srisuresh@yahoo.com
Cc: nats@ml.canonet.ne.jp, ikuo@intec.co.jp
Subject: Re: [NAT] the future of the NAT working group
From: Kuniaki Kondo <kuniaki@iij.ad.jp>
References: <200110182130.f9ILUdV07894@eecs.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200110182130.f9ILUdV07894@eecs.harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <200110221101.BEH22607.LJBJVOL@iij.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.33PL2]
X-Accept-Language: ja,en
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:01:39 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: nat-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nat-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Network Address Translation <nat.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: nat@ietf.org
Hello, Now, I have been writing a draft related NAT which is named the NATS. Few month ago, this draft had discussed on this list. Then I am improving some problems and our group which is discussing the NATS has been making a test code. In a short time, I am going to submit a new draft. I would like to discuss it on this list. "Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>" (Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:30:39 -0400 (EDT)) wrote: > > Matt, Srisuresh and the NAT WG, > > Allison and I have been discussing the status of the NAT WG. It is > our conclusion that it should close. The working group has achieved its > main goals and published a number of RFCs, it should be seen as a success > but it is now time to conclude it. > > There are two WG documents in progress that would be useful to have > finished. One is the NAT MIB, which has potential to be a useful > document, and we would like opinions as to whether to > > 1. have it completed as an individual submission (the nat mailing list > be used discussion, as we usually keep concluded working > group mailing lists alive). > 2. have it transferred to another working group's charter - one > candidate is midcom. > > The other is the NAT Friendly Application Design Guidelines. We > have not seen progress on this and think this can continue on the > basis of being an individual informational, if energy increases. > > We saw insufficient expression of support for the framework > document, so we do not not think it is worth the considerable effort that > would be required to revise it to fix the issues that the IESG had with it. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > nat mailing list > nat@ietf.org > http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat -- Kuniaki Kondo kuniaki@iij.ad.jp _______________________________________________ nat mailing list nat@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat
- [NAT] the future of the NAT working group Scott Bradner
- [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Matt Holdrege
- [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Scott Bradner
- Re: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Matt Holdrege
- Re: [NAT] the future of the NAT working group Daniel Senie
- Re: [NAT] the future of the NAT working group Matt Holdrege
- RE: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Wang, Cliff
- Re: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Rajiv Raghunarayan
- RE: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Ed Van Horne
- Re: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Rajiv Raghunarayan
- Re: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [NAT] the future of the NAT working group Kuniaki Kondo
- Re: [NAT] the future of the NAT working group Allison Mankin
- [NAT] WG Last call on draft-ietf-nat-app-guide-06… Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: [NAT] WG Last call on draft-ietf-nat-app-guid… Pyda Srisuresh