IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group

Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com> Sun, 21 October 2001 19:42 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA16239; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:42:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA17520; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:37:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA17499 for <nat@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:37:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from internet-gateway2.zurich.ibm.com (internet-gateway2-x.zurich.ibm.com [195.212.119.243]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA16216 for <nat@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:37:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from collon.zurich.ibm.com (collon.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.143]) by internet-gateway2.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA09156; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:37:12 +0200
Received: from lig32-227-114-170.us.lig-dial.ibm.com by collon.zurich.ibm.com (AIX 4.3/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA33792 from <brian@hursley.ibm.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 21:37:07 +0200
Message-Id: <3BD2D73D.64D382D2@hursley.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 16:10:05 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Matt Holdrege <matt.holdrege@verizon.net>
Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, nat@ietf.org, srisuresh@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [NAT] Re: the future of the NAT working group
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011018151553.00abd8b0@mail.gte.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: nat-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nat-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Network Address Translation <nat.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: nat@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I agree with Scott's proposal. MIBs tend to interest a very small
group of activists.

    Brian

Matt Holdrege wrote:
> 
> At 03:01 PM 10/18/2001, Scott  Bradner wrote:
> >We would actually like to close the WG now.
> 
> If I'm the only one objecting, then go ahead and close it.
> 
> >The MIB may take quite a while since some rather basic thinking
> >needs to be done on what a NAT MIB should do.  We do not see
> >that there has been enough going on relative to that in the WG
> >to warrant keeping the WG open.
> 
> This is the first I've heard of any basic issues with the NAT MIB. Have
> there been any issues brought up on the list that I might have missed? I
> thought the NAT MIB was pretty much done.



_______________________________________________
nat mailing list
nat@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email