IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nat66] Comments on draft-mrw-nat66-12

Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr> Wed, 16 March 2011 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <remi.despres@free.fr>
X-Original-To: nat66@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nat66@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3383A69E1 for <nat66@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.629, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqIXvcB88DlG for <nat66@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp21.services.sfr.fr (smtp21.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D413A69D5 for <nat66@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf2114.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 578D17000082; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:39:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by msfrf2114.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 209787000081; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:39:59 +0100 (CET)
X-SFR-UUID: 20110316163959133.209787000081@msfrf2114.sfr.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <758DD037-9DC2-4A1E-BEAE-7E99CBED6D3A@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:39:56 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E35AB0E0-81E0-4076-BAF4-1CABF2EBDD2D@free.fr>
References: <20110314063002.28048.29694.idtracker@localhost> <19F3A4CD-F39C-4F17-A6E9-7AA8AFBC6B3B@cisco.com> <CF8367A6-F303-43D7-99C6-D40D1DD5D5D9@free.fr> <125BC580-ED43-40EE-B6B9-FD88557C35B9@apple.com> <758DD037-9DC2-4A1E-BEAE-7E99CBED6D3A@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: NAT66 HappyFunBall <nat66@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nat66] Comments on draft-mrw-nat66-12
X-BeenThere: nat66@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT." <nat66.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66>, <mailto:nat66-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nat66>
List-Post: <mailto:nat66@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nat66-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66>, <mailto:nat66-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 16:38:33 -0000

Le 15 mars 2011 à 23:51, Fred Baker a écrit :

> ... Apart from the fact that I misspelled his name (shame on me), his comments miss the mark.

1. Thanks for the spelling bit.

2. Is this to mean that you ignore the datagram vs packet bit?

3. I remain convinced that what is said about multihoming is really short, but I won't insist. That's your draft. 

Regards,
RD

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email