IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nbs] First draft agenda

Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu> Wed, 27 October 2010 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: nbs@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nbs@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCED3A69AC for <nbs@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4ziMD+JLDKp for <nbs@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de (smtp0.netlab.nec.de [195.37.70.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD103A677E for <nbs@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5308D2800017D; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:59:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas1.office.hd)
Received: from smtp0.netlab.nec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas1.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ig7aNzXfcXD; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:59:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (ENCELADUS.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by smtp0.netlab.nec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3459D2800017A; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:59:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PALLENE.office.hd ([169.254.1.152]) by ENCELADUS.office.hd ([192.168.24.52]) with mapi id 14.01.0255.000; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:59:05 +0200
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, "nbs@ietf.org" <nbs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nbs] First draft agenda
Thread-Index: Act1CQTZi0Xrpbc3QSGhs3EnxX5yUQAhvyWAAAcrnqA=
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:59:04 +0000
Message-ID: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0754F0A@PALLENE.office.hd>
References: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0752719@PALLENE.office.hd> <722633D9-BA33-498E-A2A3-3194B6020806@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <722633D9-BA33-498E-A2A3-3194B6020806@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.67]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0020_01CB75BD.963F9850"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [nbs] First draft agenda
X-BeenThere: nbs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Name based sockets discussion list <nbs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nbs>, <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nbs>
List-Post: <mailto:nbs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nbs>, <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:57:27 -0000

Hi Lars,

a valid point. 

Do we have anybody out of the space of OS vendors and application
implementers on the list here that can speak up in that respect? (now or at
the meeting)

Thanks,

  Martin

martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London
W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 8:33 AM
> To: Martin Stiemerling
> Cc: nbs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [nbs] First draft agenda
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 2010-10-26, at 15:26, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> > It seems that we have two bigger areas to be handled separately
> during the BoF:
> >
> > - API issues
> > - Stack Change Proposals (below the API doing all the magic)
> 
> I'd like to add a third issue, which to me is as important: where are
> the OS and application implementors that want the NBS extensions? I
> have no doubt that we could specify the technical details needed to
> make NBS work; I wonder who would care if we did.
> 
> 
> Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email