Re: [nbs] First draft agenda

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 27 October 2010 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nbs@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nbs@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02383A63CB for <nbs@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id re6hPAfDAZte for <nbs@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0DD3A63C9 for <nbs@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1163452fxm.31 for <nbs@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=evOr6Q5RzKQ2xw9TGYOKukKGwRt7gpqfb4iYVNZ4/FA=; b=tlPrwYlw5uQpusgHQ0vxRjTEzVLuybqhErRVXiHCcSPIIv6bxPCpoCNVQ9hTwgJFm7 eE55ZYWc09ttfteaVHFX7FP+jMly0Xom20YHYWyd5Tue9NOyIVOPSraP1imk3XWKN83X JMchSbZLZom0ED9rs2Or5W9I0q41PBzrZod6M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uQi2xKebKyFHKKbDyp0VSqDNNWy3Y0TwTd6m6fLPCjJQpMzZB6F8WThSkAFp8DK1M4 SN14+2EQrd+22WebxasFwAf3X/R4UVOcy0/KedgZs4/Esg9LZSFD9LT3/HnJ+9mUOX/Q ShJtI7c1nTqNND4O7btroYjtZ7r4L2//h/F70=
Received: by 10.223.101.206 with SMTP id d14mr1292733fao.128.1288212430799; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n8sm129397faa.7.2010.10.27.13.47.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CC88FC7.5040501@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:47:03 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
References: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0752719@PALLENE.office.hd> <722633D9-BA33-498E-A2A3-3194B6020806@nokia.com> <EBA3CA08-905F-4CAE-86E4-E05FD398FB20@free.fr> <116CC7E2-56EF-4FC9-8B8B-295C20E3563F@nokia.com> <FEC5F585-C483-41A6-B026-55F9EEB0F5F0@free.fr> <E4819A06-7297-4468-A5DC-3CAAD3C6758C@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E4819A06-7297-4468-A5DC-3CAAD3C6758C@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "nbs@ietf.org" <nbs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nbs] First draft agenda
X-BeenThere: nbs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Name based sockets discussion list <nbs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nbs>, <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nbs>
List-Post: <mailto:nbs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nbs>, <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:45:23 -0000

On 2010-10-28 03:15, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2010-10-27, at 16:33, Rémi Després wrote:
>> What I hope though, if it is so, is that IETF can continue to be a place where solutions to identified problems can be discussed among specialists.
>> The lack of referrals that applications can use, and that don't depend on address changes is AFAIK an one of these identified problems. 
> 
> that I certainly agree with. And I may well have misjudged OS and application developer interest, we will find out at the BOF.

I notice that you have bumped draft-carpenter-referral-ps-01
from the agenda. But actually the issue of getting OS and apps
interest seems to be exactly the same for the two topics.
By the way, the BOF clashes with the apparea open meeting, where
I also want to present my draft. (I also need to be in softwire
at the same time.)

    Brian