IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nbs] First draft agenda

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Wed, 27 October 2010 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: nbs@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nbs@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3453A681F for <nbs@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.516, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id udp+N-wUQ0bp for <nbs@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (mgw-sa02.ext.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917AF3A696C for <nbs@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o9R6Ws3V010135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:32:54 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-41-616322471"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0752719@PALLENE.office.hd>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:32:47 +0300
Message-Id: <722633D9-BA33-498E-A2A3-3194B6020806@nokia.com>
References: <E84E7B8FF3F2314DA16E48EC89AB49F0752719@PALLENE.office.hd>
To: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:32:48 +0300 (EEST)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "nbs@ietf.org" <nbs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nbs] First draft agenda
X-BeenThere: nbs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Name based sockets discussion list <nbs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nbs>, <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nbs>
List-Post: <mailto:nbs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nbs>, <mailto:nbs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 06:31:07 -0000

Hi,

On 2010-10-26, at 15:26, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> It seems that we have two bigger areas to be handled separately during the BoF:
> 
> - API issues
> - Stack Change Proposals (below the API doing all the magic)

I'd like to add a third issue, which to me is as important: where are the OS and application implementors that want the NBS extensions? I have no doubt that we could specify the technical details needed to make NBS work; I wonder who would care if we did.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email