Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done

TGLASSEY <tglassey@earthlink.net> Fri, 09 May 2014 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: nea@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138881A02C7 for <nea@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fi2B2cIXK305 for <nea@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1971A02B6 for <nea@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=fGl4kGJvbYupFXWHqU8Kd3LgzUQLYe4KWs+jtc1tUVAwUECkKzpPEkiNrK0aeI+1; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.134.155] (helo=[192.168.0.4]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1WinBu-0006pw-9u for nea@ietf.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 11:58:30 -0400
Message-ID: <536CFB32.7010704@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 08:58:42 -0700
From: TGLASSEY <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nea@ietf.org
References: <20140508061524.81DEC180095@rfc-editor.org> <536CEFFA.40509@hannas.com>
In-Reply-To: <536CEFFA.40509@hannas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7938caa79a98ac1b68de91301de9e0ecb2350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.134.155
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nea/cHFhzWUnh9Ibv8ZAuQL2T3QtDrw
Subject: Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done
X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nea/>
List-Post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 15:58:38 -0000

What is the status of the Cisco Patent here?

Todd

On 5/9/2014 8:10 AM, Steve Hanna wrote:
> I'm happy to say that the nea working group has completed our last
> milestone: publishing PT-EAP as a Standards Track RFC. TCG has
> published a document bringing their corresponding standard
> (IF-T/EAP) into alignment with the published version of PT-EAP:
>
> http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/community/2014/05/complete_set_of_nac_standards_from_ietf_and_tcg 
>
>
> So we have achieved our goal of getting one set of standards for
> posture assessment.
>
> This WG will now be closed. The email list will stay open for
> any needed discussions.
>
> Thanks to all who have worked on the NEA protocols over the years.
>
> Good work!
>
> Steve Hanna
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Nea] RFC 7171 on PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol for 
> Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Tunnel Methods
> Date: Wed,  7 May 2014 23:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
> CC: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, nea@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
>         RFC 7171
>
>         Title:      PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol
>                     for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Tunnel
>                     Methods
>         Author:     N. Cam-Winget, P. Sangster
>         Status:     Standards Track
>         Stream:     IETF
>         Date:       May 2014
>         Mailbox:    ncamwing@cisco.com,
>                     paul_sangster@symantec.com
>         Pages:      19
>         Characters: 45604
>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>
>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-09.txt
>
>         URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7171.txt
>
> This document specifies PT-EAP, a Posture Transport (PT) protocol
> based on the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) and designed to
> be used only inside an EAP tunnel method protected by Transport Layer
> Security (TLS).  The document also describes the intended
> applicability of PT-EAP.
>
> This document is a product of the Network Endpoint Assessment Working 
> Group of the IETF.
>
> This is now a Proposed Standard.
>
> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and 
> suggestions
> for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
> Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
> status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>   http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>   http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>
> For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nea mailing list
> Nea@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nea mailing list
> Nea@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4577 / Virus Database: 3931/7462 - Release Date: 05/08/14
>
>

-- 
-------------

Personal Email - Disclaimers Apply