Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done
Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com> Fri, 09 May 2014 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <jsklein@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nea@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nea@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F261A001B for <nea@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id go8hzzZ286EX for <nea@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBC21A0013 for <nea@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id e16so5275721qcx.13 for <nea@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 13:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=V2TRTl8RAXecYbiVjXRKSuS5JEsaPZdEG0EM4yZzsCg=; b=XoXOoT0PKk44SP/O/f4zn1nut5P3cflVyaO3PcObhA9DLvS/i8o++RhQ1sgW3lvHdl HsbEHd5NdJjCKaRZzmxEn9l6fQaAruTur7Qg0h8vW6SkUwf8Sg7b5be67+qf4ZzpVhAF HcJUmd/FfX8Ya8b9/qmSu3ZeZcIBqFeZOQCG33u4g/MWEkp3eL2FgI1J/D/+ZHkVquYq CdK2PlvTy/Oh2waNK42UkEV8PjEeRnsgcsfF3N6jYnyLJIZDwsIfPMJtwb7BxCGyskXt elSoTHzWLC389Llb8AUf1NBwdqBjv3VSwhr2HXg6jY179bJHaPpIIXqe6L4/mgGcwO0I Tfpw==
X-Received: by 10.224.0.79 with SMTP id 15mr18459004qaa.2.1399668042828; Fri, 09 May 2014 13:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.192.138 with HTTP; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <536D35C1.10303@hannas.com>
References: <20140508061524.81DEC180095@rfc-editor.org> <536CEFFA.40509@hannas.com> <536CFB32.7010704@earthlink.net> <536D35C1.10303@hannas.com>
From: Joe Klein <jsklein@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 16:40:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAP032Tsc50jdnzqrWQtckSbVrqW4hgedd_+jOmNAfWo47yrYBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Hanna <steve@hannas.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bf0d4987f2d2704f8fd9cfe"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nea/i0ZAPRSUwzAPJuaLuJ1-OtS4hHY
Cc: nea@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done
X-BeenThere: nea@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Endpoint Assessment discussion list <nea.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nea/>
List-Post: <mailto:nea@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea>, <mailto:nea-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 20:40:51 -0000
Does anyone have working code for this protocol? I would like to validate a few assumptions. Joe Klein "Inveniam viam aut faciam" On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Steve Hanna <steve@hannas.com> wrote: > Todd, > > I presume that you're referring to this IPR disclosure: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1889/ > > If that's the case, you should refer to Cisco's statement > in the IPR disclosure linked to above. > > Speaking only for myself and noting that I'm not a lawyer, > I don't think there's any reason to worry about that IPR. > In layman's terms, the Cisco statement says that anyone can > use their IPR to implement the spec. However, if you sue > them, they'll sue you back. > > Are you planning to implement the spec or just asking? > > Thanks, > > Steve > > > On 5/9/2014 11:58 AM, TGLASSEY wrote: > >> What is the status of the Cisco Patent here? >> >> Todd >> >> On 5/9/2014 8:10 AM, Steve Hanna wrote: >> >>> I'm happy to say that the nea working group has completed our last >>> milestone: publishing PT-EAP as a Standards Track RFC. TCG has >>> published a document bringing their corresponding standard >>> (IF-T/EAP) into alignment with the published version of PT-EAP: >>> >>> http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/community/2014/05/complete_ >>> set_of_nac_standards_from_ietf_and_tcg >>> >>> >>> So we have achieved our goal of getting one set of standards for >>> posture assessment. >>> >>> This WG will now be closed. The email list will stay open for >>> any needed discussions. >>> >>> Thanks to all who have worked on the NEA protocols over the years. >>> >>> Good work! >>> >>> Steve Hanna >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [Nea] RFC 7171 on PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol for >>> Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Tunnel Methods >>> Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 23:15:24 -0700 (PDT) >>> From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >>> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org >>> CC: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, nea@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >>> >>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >>> >>> >>> RFC 7171 >>> >>> Title: PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) Protocol >>> for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Tunnel >>> Methods >>> Author: N. Cam-Winget, P. Sangster >>> Status: Standards Track >>> Stream: IETF >>> Date: May 2014 >>> Mailbox: ncamwing@cisco.com, >>> paul_sangster@symantec.com >>> Pages: 19 >>> Characters: 45604 >>> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >>> >>> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-nea-pt-eap-09.txt >>> >>> URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7171.txt >>> >>> This document specifies PT-EAP, a Posture Transport (PT) protocol >>> based on the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) and designed to >>> be used only inside an EAP tunnel method protected by Transport Layer >>> Security (TLS). The document also describes the intended >>> applicability of PT-EAP. >>> >>> This document is a product of the Network Endpoint Assessment Working >>> Group of the IETF. >>> >>> This is now a Proposed Standard. >>> >>> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track >>> protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and >>> suggestions >>> for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet >>> Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and >>> status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. >>> >>> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see >>> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >>> http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >>> >>> For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/search >>> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html >>> >>> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the >>> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless >>> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for >>> unlimited distribution. >>> >>> >>> The RFC Editor Team >>> Association Management Solutions, LLC >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nea mailing list >>> Nea@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nea mailing list >>> Nea@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2014.0.4577 / Virus Database: 3931/7462 - Release Date: 05/08/14 >>> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Nea mailing list > Nea@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nea >
- [Nea] RFC 7171 on PT-EAP: Posture Transport (PT) … rfc-editor
- [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done Steve Hanna
- Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done TGLASSEY
- Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done Steve Hanna
- Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done Joe Klein
- Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done Steve Hanna
- Re: [Nea] Congrats on Job Well Done Andreas Steffen