IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] GRE support in DSMIPv6 - AD review

"Giaretta, Gerardo" <gerardog@qualcomm.com> Wed, 14 January 2009 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nemo-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-nemo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A151E3A6A33; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3393B3A6A24 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.68
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.68 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.919, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41FMQtxfs0zd for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3063A6A15 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:20:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=gerardog@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1231957186; x=1263493186; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:x-ironport-av; z=From:=20"Giaretta,=20Gerardo"=20<gerardog@qualcomm.com> |To:=20Hesham=20Soliman=20<hesham@elevatemobile.com>,=20" mext@ietf.org"=20<mext@ietf.org>|CC:=20Pasi=20Eronen=20<P asi.Eronen@nokia.com>|Date:=20Wed,=2014=20Jan=202009=2010 :19:17=20-0800|Subject:=20RE:=20GRE=20support=20in=20DSMI Pv6=20-=20AD=20review|Thread-Topic:=20GRE=20support=20in =20DSMIPv6=20-=20AD=20review|Thread-Index:=20Acl2Qty8AAnK SyLlR0eCYUg0kSOoIQAMb/rB|Message-ID:=20<057632CE4CE10D45A 1A3D6D19206C3A3D9AA781B@NASANEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> |References:=20<C594245E.B121%hesham@elevatemobile.com> |In-Reply-To:=20<C594245E.B121%hesham@elevatemobile.com> |Accept-Language:=20en-US|Content-Language:=20en-US |X-MS-Has-Attach:|X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage: =20en-US|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-as cii"|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi=3D"5 300,2777,5495"=3B=20a=3D"14650247"; bh=N2PRpElpH5iBZSbDnKbSAfpoRHZs649xOZVigOa6Lfo=; b=nbBBlC5D1UMgDlGvJBF7NOrO/TTMi8i/IPfJ/s1xj5TAgpz1rd9WZapv 4ZA6bKoXLCTyCVLLezTLMT1rKzhpouVrpNlVPGIcCRrkyceREekSrjXCq 0ZIvyvnw9P8Aud2AqupHXVRaXZoT+Fwp45KeiSIAaH/uMd8lYD3dfn8PS E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5495"; a="14650247"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO ithilien.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Jan 2009 10:19:46 -0800
Received: from msgtransport04.qualcomm.com (msgtransport04.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.156]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id n0EIJkt2029645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:19:46 -0800
Received: from nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com [10.46.93.98]) by msgtransport04.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id n0EIJRQF013411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:19:45 -0800
Received: from NASANEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com ([192.168.73.132]) by nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com ([10.46.93.98]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:19:38 -0800
From: "Giaretta, Gerardo" <gerardog@qualcomm.com>
To: Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com>, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:19:17 -0800
Thread-Topic: GRE support in DSMIPv6 - AD review
Thread-Index: Acl2Qty8AAnKSyLlR0eCYUg0kSOoIQAMb/rB
Message-ID: <057632CE4CE10D45A1A3D6D19206C3A3D9AA781B@NASANEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <C594245E.B121%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <C594245E.B121%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Pasi Eronen <Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] GRE support in DSMIPv6 - AD review
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Hesham,

I am fine with your proposal.

Gerardo

________________________________________
From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hesham Soliman [hesham@elevatemobile.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 4:23 AM
To: mext@ietf.org
Cc: Pasi Eronen
Subject: [MEXT] GRE support in DSMIPv6 - AD review

Folks,

Part of Pasi's review for DSMIPv6 was a comment on the lack of specification
for GRE support in the spec. He said it was vastly under-specified, no
details on the tunnelling, setting of different parts of the GRE header
...etc.

I suggested that we don't explicitly mention GRE in the spec but we keep the
TLV tunnelling format and reserve the numbers for NETLMM to specify exactly
how it will be used in a separate document. I think you would agree that
this is largely driven by NETLMM needs and we shouldn't specify the details
in MEXT. Pasi was ok with that.

Please express your opinion on this soon because Pasi's comments are the
last comments for the draft and I want to handle them by Monday at the
latest.

Please avoid discussing the merits of GRE....etc, the question is:

Are there any objections to removing explicit references to GRE while
reserving the numbers in the TLV header for it to be specified clearly in
NETLMM?

Thanks,

Hesham


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email