[Nemops-interest] Re: [Nemops-workshop-attendees] NEMOPS Workshop Report

[Phil Shafer <[e-mail]>]

The contents in this section seem disconnected, or maybe they are just independent:

	Some saw NETCONF for configuration as being successful in some larger-scale
	deployments.  Although this statement is true in some contexts, many operators
	indicated their need to rely on other forms of access to manage their networks
	such as CLIs, expect scripts, and other protocols.  Work in this area is needed
	to bring NETCONF into significantly greater deployment and usability.  Some
	participants see RESTCONF as a significant step forward in solving this dilemma.


I think there are four items here, summarized as:

a) NETCONF has some successful deployments.
b) Many operators (all, really) manage some devices that don't support NETCONF.
c) More acceptance of NETCONF will help.
d) RESTCONF is seen by some as helpful also.

It might help to pull them into separate paragraphs with more details, since each claim stands on its own, and none were universal.

Okay, (b) is universal, which is the bad news ;^)

Thanks,
 Phil


On 3 Mar 2025, at 15:29, Wes Hardaker wrote:

> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> Thanks Dhruv, that's certainly better.  And thank you Jürgen for bringing this up.  I was the one that tried to craft that section and in the end after reviewing the notes from the final conversation it all really amounted to one bullet point, which did seem odd to document that way and I never found a better way.  I think part of the problem is the section title "Additional work needed".  Maybe a better title, in addition to Dhruv's improvements, would be "Conclusions that did not reach consensus during the takeways discussion" so it's very clear it's a subjection of just the key takeaways section (3.4)?  Thoughts?
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:26 AM Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 4:57 PM Jürgen Schönwälder <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Thanks for putting this report together. I think it is a decent
> summary what we talked about. The only thing I find a bit misplaced is
> section 3.4.5, additional work is apparently needed in many areas and
> it is unclear why this item 1 is specifically highlighted.
>
>
> Dhruv: This section is meant to capture points that remained unresolved during live editing of key takeaways (section 3.4). I’ll add some clarifying text to my working copy on GitHub.
>
> https://github.com/intarchboard/draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report/commit/4d15fd93201d80bcdc3076f75c7f8ccb31ffb858<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_intarchboard_draft-2Diab-2Dnemops-2Dworkshop-2Dreport_commit_4d15fd93201d80bcdc3076f75c7f8ccb31ffb858&d=DwMFaQ&c=qzHnJIRvjI6L-clJH8JwLQvf_Iq43fzikf6aoxZgMb8&r=0c5g_jBisMd0Mvrv260WjCsDo_lphr-fsVao5L9S4DI&m=NTtW9VH7rWRyeReZ1x112VLCaemPtL2Qz0Jj0OGTAD9m0T7CnW8Q9IumBz9nb-mF&s=F5uI2ZGfgVT_Vukux46BZKph79bV7Hb_uEmGCwhRkpc&e=__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!ACEw7pp-UvLxLzlusFjdXvXk7FK6aege31qsjC5V1Gi9uOwMVHcwc1HJJXQ93vQxaZRndn7G9_PS6OQ$>
>
> Thanks!
> Dhruv
>
>
>
> /js
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:02:30PM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wes and I have posted the initial version of the NEMOPS Workshop Report -
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Diab-2Dnemops-2Dworkshop-2Dreport_&d=DwMFaQ&c=qzHnJIRvjI6L-clJH8JwLQvf_Iq43fzikf6aoxZgMb8&r=0c5g_jBisMd0Mvrv260WjCsDo_lphr-fsVao5L9S4DI&m=NTtW9VH7rWRyeReZ1x112VLCaemPtL2Qz0Jj0OGTAD9m0T7CnW8Q9IumBz9nb-mF&s=ULfpKooWVyvASwFWQDEfWWem_moxKEJTzlJ-z7NcR7A&e=__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!ACEw7pp-UvLxLzlusFjdXvXk7FK6aege31qsjC5V1Gi9uOwMVHcwc1HJJXQ93vQxaZRndn7GLXiAz-g$>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report-01.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_archive_id_draft-2Diab-2Dnemops-2Dworkshop-2Dreport-2D01.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=qzHnJIRvjI6L-clJH8JwLQvf_Iq43fzikf6aoxZgMb8&r=0c5g_jBisMd0Mvrv260WjCsDo_lphr-fsVao5L9S4DI&m=NTtW9VH7rWRyeReZ1x112VLCaemPtL2Qz0Jj0OGTAD9m0T7CnW8Q9IumBz9nb-mF&s=qy-3tA-m3cMJc0ZWx7qUJH-PqU7qEivfoM-M8IQAglc&e=__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!ACEw7pp-UvLxLzlusFjdXvXk7FK6aege31qsjC5V1Gi9uOwMVHcwc1HJJXQ93vQxaZRndn7GYfJKqvQ$>
>>
>> We’d appreciate your feedback, ideally on the [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> list
>> or directly to the authors. You can also submit a PR on GitHub:
>>
>> https://github.com/intarchboard/draft-iab-nemops-workshop-report<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_intarchboard_draft-2Diab-2Dnemops-2Dworkshop-2Dreport&d=DwMFaQ&c=qzHnJIRvjI6L-clJH8JwLQvf_Iq43fzikf6aoxZgMb8&r=0c5g_jBisMd0Mvrv260WjCsDo_lphr-fsVao5L9S4DI&m=NTtW9VH7rWRyeReZ1x112VLCaemPtL2Qz0Jj0OGTAD9m0T7CnW8Q9IumBz9nb-mF&s=4GM5--2O_fsnGn_KkS3ZvJOezcp1ANtFOW_mYNw1G5I&e=__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!ACEw7pp-UvLxLzlusFjdXvXk7FK6aege31qsjC5V1Gi9uOwMVHcwc1HJJXQ93vQxaZRndn7Gvo6B_2A$>
>>
>> Reminder: The report summarizes the proceedings of the workshop and does
>> not necessarily reflect the IAB’s views or positions.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Dhruv & Wes
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nemops-workshop-attendees mailing list -- [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
>
>
> --
> Jürgen Schönwälder              Constructor University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> _______________________________________________
> Nemops-workshop-attendees mailing list -- [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
>
>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> USC/ISI
> _______________________________________________
> Nemops-workshop-attendees mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]