[Netconf] NETCONF Protocol Interoperability Event around Quebec Meeting ?

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Sun, 03 April 2011 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1503A6929 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zomYS1mNtC1J for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D392D3A693E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 00:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p337dZnW028769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:39:35 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p337dYkm003132; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:39:34 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.103]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 3 Apr 2011 09:39:34 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 09:35:23 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6401E11409@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: NETCONF Protocol Interoperability Event around Quebec Meeting ?
Thread-Index: AcvxHXprVu3yJf0tStuK4v79NPxHIAAs0gig
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2011 07:39:34.0538 (UTC) FILETIME=[46EA56A0:01CBF1D2]
Subject: [Netconf] NETCONF Protocol Interoperability Event around Quebec Meeting ?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:37:57 -0000

Dear NETCONF WG,

in the IETF80 NETCONF session it has been discussed whether a NETCONF
protocol interoperability event should be organized to take place around
the Quebec meeting.
The NETCONF interoperability event would be helpful to get our Proposed
Standards to the Draft Standard status.

The chairs would like to sense of the WG for the level of interest of
the implementers on such an interop event.

The focus in the interoperability event would be on following RFCs:
- draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis (in RFC Ed Queue),
- draft-ietf-netconf-rfc4742bis (in RFC Ed Queue),
- RFC 5277 - NETCONF Event Notifications,
- RFC 6022 - YANG Module for NETCONF Monitoring,
- RFC 5717 - Partial Lock RPC for NETCONF,
- draft-ietf-netconf-with-defaults (in RFC Ed Queue).


The questions we would like to clarify are in the first step:

- Who has which implementations ready to test by July 1st, 2011?
-  Who would come with implementations and participate if the event gets
organised?
- Who can provide content for testing (i.e. YANG modules e.g.
Monitoring)?
- Who would be willing to prepare test cases?

Please state your interest and opinion on the interop event to the
chairs directly.

Mehmet & Bert