[netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-38

Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 16 September 2024 20:37 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172651902735.195.15586972746483448400@dt-datatracker-65695bf5bc-rgg8z>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:37:07 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: 2V4VTKVIVIYH35UO367WL7DBL5WRVCQE
CC: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
Reply-To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Subject: [netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-38
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/-p3OJnPUp2TLkrgAN-eLNDlXtIo>

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-38
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2024-09-16
IETF LC End Date: 2024-09-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document describes two YANG modules, one for RESTCONF client and the other
module to for RESTCONF server.

Question: I thought JSON is more common for RESTCONF. is there a JSON modules
specifying the RESTCONF Client and Server? If yes, can you provide the
reference? and document the benefit of using YANG instead of using JSON modules?

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

Thank you very much,
Linda Dunbar

[netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-n… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker