Re: [netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-06

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

No, I am not not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Kent (as co-author)


> On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
> 
> As part of preparation for WG LC (which is planned for after the holidays):
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?
> 
> Please state either:
> 
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
> 
> If yes to the above, please state either:
> 
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> 
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
> 
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
> 
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> 
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> 
> Please note, the reason that I am making this request rather than the
> WG chairs is because both chairs are listed as authors on this document.
> 
> Thank you,
> Rob (OPS AD)
> 
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.