[netconf] YANG Push module errors

Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz> Thu, 01 April 2021 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2083A177E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIoS-9EUA-Yj for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kalendar.cesnet.cz (kalendar.cesnet.cz [78.128.211.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA9523A177D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by kalendar.cesnet.cz (Postfix, from userid 110) id CB2AC6009E; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 17:14:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=kalendar; t=1617290046; bh=q8b/TwQ2y7CGET4mPtzwOivnHi4gMF+OQYuuksrPzbQ=; h=From:To:Date:Subject; b=uPfys8eUHffmNj8RlURvBG/VaEx12AzFblQPtun2kwDz/tPJQjnP2kWa6e1h+eHPI nwSGP0lIQHXdnbY8U3P0OY5lsoVeuBISOX+PNwC0NKD+06UeaOGlzKa/2hPU5aNxXi LZx68OPVDGoPRz7iZ+nyJsHQxiGHmIQdOp2XL86M=
From: =?utf-8?q?Michal_Va=C5=A1ko?= <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
To: "netconf" <netconf@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 17:14:06 +0200
Message-ID: <5303-6065e300-21-62233d80@261934342>
X-Forward: 84.42.188.124
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/3mu3VULbrwseOBjgG0Md_EqEtEc>
Subject: [netconf] YANG Push module errors
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:14:20 -0000

Hi,

we are led to believe there is an error in the ietf-yang-push module published in RFC 8641 but I wanted to discuss it here before submitting an errata. There are 2 augments [1] on a notification that is conditional on "configured" feature but these 2 augments are not conditional. Having this feature disabled, we were not able to load this module into our tools. Does anyone disagree with this or with submitting an errata?

Regards,
Michal

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8641#page-48 and the next page