[netconf] YANG Push module errors

Michal Vaško <mvasko@cesnet.cz> Thu, 01 April 2021 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2083A177E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cesnet.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIoS-9EUA-Yj for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kalendar.cesnet.cz (kalendar.cesnet.cz []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA9523A177D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 08:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by kalendar.cesnet.cz (Postfix, from userid 110) id CB2AC6009E; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 17:14:06 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cesnet.cz; s=kalendar; t=1617290046; bh=q8b/TwQ2y7CGET4mPtzwOivnHi4gMF+OQYuuksrPzbQ=; h=From:To:Date:Subject; b=uPfys8eUHffmNj8RlURvBG/VaEx12AzFblQPtun2kwDz/tPJQjnP2kWa6e1h+eHPI nwSGP0lIQHXdnbY8U3P0OY5lsoVeuBISOX+PNwC0NKD+06UeaOGlzKa/2hPU5aNxXi LZx68OPVDGoPRz7iZ+nyJsHQxiGHmIQdOp2XL86M=
From: =?utf-8?q?Michal_Va=C5=A1ko?= <mvasko@cesnet.cz>
To: "netconf" <netconf@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 17:14:06 +0200
Message-ID: <5303-6065e300-21-62233d80@261934342>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/3mu3VULbrwseOBjgG0Md_EqEtEc>
Subject: [netconf] YANG Push module errors
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:14:20 -0000


we are led to believe there is an error in the ietf-yang-push module published in RFC 8641 but I wanted to discuss it here before submitting an errata. There are 2 augments [1] on a notification that is conditional on "configured" feature but these 2 augments are not conditional. Having this feature disabled, we were not able to load this module into our tools. Does anyone disagree with this or with submitting an errata?


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8641#page-48 and the next page