[netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (5761)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 24 June 2019 01:08 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B9D120090 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ej3meHDG_CkM for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E56512004A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 72B56B80D5C; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: andy@yumaworks.com, mbj@tail-f.com, kwatsen@juniper.net, ibagdona@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, kent+ietf@watsen.net, mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: bill.wu@huawei.com, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190624010833.72B56B80D5C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 18:08:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/3woyEQPh-B9FI56sa2laNiJ_axI>
Subject: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (5761)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 01:09:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8040, "RESTCONF Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5761 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Qin WU <bill.wu@huawei.com> Section: 4.1.1 Original Text ------------- If the data resource already exists, then the POST request MUST fail and a "409 Conflict" status-line MUST be returned. The error-tag value "resource-denied" is used in this case Corrected Text -------------- If the data resource already exists, then the POST request MUST fail and a "409 Conflict" status-line MUST be returned. The error-tag value "data-exists" is used in this case Notes ----- The error-tag value should be corrected as "data-exists" in this case based on the context. According to error-tag definition in RFC6241: error-tag: resource-denied error-type: transport, rpc, protocol, application error-severity: error error-info: none Description: Request could not be completed because of insufficient resources. It is apparent error-tag value "data-exists" should be corresponding to the data resource already exists condition. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8040 (draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18) -------------------------------------- Title : RESTCONF Protocol Publication Date : January 2017 Author(s) : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, K. Watsen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040 (57… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Qin Wu
- Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8040… Qin Wu