Re: [netconf] RN: final IPR disclosure confirmation

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"


Andy


On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:35 PM Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:

> To each author listed on the "To" line.
>
> In order to complete the Shepherd writeup, are you aware of any IPR that
> applies to
> draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif?  Please Reply-All to *this* email and
> state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If "yes", has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If "yes" again, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by
> responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant
> IPR.  This document will not advance to the next stage until a response
> has been
> received from each author and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO
> ALL
> OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author
> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which
> encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an
> IETF
> contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or
> discussion related
> to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed
> above
> and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Kent // as both Shepherd and co-Chair
>
>