[netconf] Re: [Tsv-art] UDP default port

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kent,

Let me be more direct then :-)

Hi Kent the contributor, if you believe QUIC is the solution, please 
write a draft.
Hi Kent the WG chair, just please stop delaying THIS draft.

Regards, Benoit

On 12/20/2024 2:05 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> This started with the TSVART review.
>
> I was trying to find to way (with QUIC) to address Joe’s comment while 
> also (hopefully) still making it easy to implement on line cards.
>
> The “cherry on top” is that QUIC supports mixed reliability, which 
> seems ideal for a logging protocol, don’t you think?
>
> My worry is that the proposed solution will be okay for routers and 
> switches, but not so much for firewalls and NAC devices, that also 
> have high throughput thru line-cards.
>
> Kent / contributor
>
>
>> On Dec 20, 2024, at 6:52 AM, Benoit Claise 
>> <benoit.claise=[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>  Kent,
>>
>> I guess I fail to understand this willingness to come back to the use 
>> cases behind this draft, to try to find new solutions here (QUIC), 
>> and to postpone further the publication.
>> A 4 years old WG document, with 6 implementations (see Implementation 
>> Status 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-udp-notif#name-implementation-status>). 
>> Isn't it time to ship it?
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email [e-mail]