IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] Virtual hum for the question on "https-notif" draft

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 21 April 2020 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B647E3A092B for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GIlYUriIgOm for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0F83A092A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id t11so5967141pgg.2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=RilOseONb7wWA1yHl+D5dEfRurq5V2Ptfa+JaZJgIZc=; b=kU/vJpecbL1TwbqnkNHd7xLJhchyfwmxGt8zQtjWQt0W0ehyrdfvnz6KI3tBezj3+o XT9iKvJKdKgCiwFd0bp19t8MeSnAmmN5DsfwiY4V9uSHoZ8S+KcgljgnaKD2bpwUwmJQ rZeI1u7HhfOhf7fORCxEWwXjY7CQzMnoCErtKy3nKhbLXXtSftZ0mQ+r5MxNsqmA6EAW 434fi9TVxr1ugtQizh/t9ekI1rZK/Q5v7F4dM5XxYPTXj3q1vWXOGhVTrIOQqtbpW5hL 47mOTPqVwQyKRo4DwE2mX5DV/ooSlBdiKf3nnk5ur6+A3O/c0RSHqA+anMFdM/ger0U/ 68oA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=RilOseONb7wWA1yHl+D5dEfRurq5V2Ptfa+JaZJgIZc=; b=FfD5gKyms/3gX6jScQ+2xasj0zAAiqIrCrX8n6S6GkVS67BS1eb2ipofNVsPvUDCFQ Yda/q3XRqv8EDXrGnm0MY43Esed/KSv+Erjjy8K4eJm7Bs0oy9Twgu5jz+7VA1KcwoYE AgtYaXlWKVFnVcHtkIbK/QH+km5gAYVsC+mZYu0BdUDciC68Vc5P22AXXXFzYhwO6PRf Q0VUjwrrOOIkXzTl3u7fd1zUaUCtdElMaCRSo0U2bjDjqLl5BsJyljnP1Kj7zMyW7ABh Sld2+CIzWGHRrwDmSybMutIDSrqE9E1Mv/ACEQPt/uu1+Mj56uurnl+aK+lkSEXbg3PK qpeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubXFuCH/vVT6f8rtG4y9KewtjxRzvGSgpfOdqnhmwA78m1g+HS2 ruGvX7Jtl882ReCc824nYrClQUc9L68=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKeaiF7gdw5FgF8ywi399BDJIMpJ8l4kAv11EtI1dVWo30mZavCJ6FIuxIYVo6Gdes6hGPFtA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:2a85:: with SMTP id q127mr19273033pfq.108.1587430102385; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5600:5020:e55d:5a57:43c4:eb42? ([2601:647:5600:5020:e55d:5a57:43c4:eb42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm5278294pja.2.2020.04.20.17.48.20 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D935DC30-017E-48AC-9411-25CDBBD08B8F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
Message-Id: <5CE2095E-7117-4092-B356-A5C4FF490D10@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:48:19 -0700
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/5cb91SD7wfrgdei4wBailQSG6xQ>
Subject: [netconf] Virtual hum for the question on "https-notif" draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:48:26 -0000

At the 107 NETCONF virtual meeting, the authors posed the question of mandatory encoding for draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif-02> draft to the WG. This virtual hum in the form of a survey is being presented to record the response from the WG.

Please respond by selecting one of the options in the survey page.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/68W3DX3

The relevant slide that was used for discussion was this. In addition to the options discussed here, Rob suggested that the WG could defer to the market to decide.


Thanks

Mahesh & Kent (as co-chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email