[Netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 11:14 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA1A130F75; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf.all@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153122128332.25153.10473559847025784058@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:14:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/5ejxNCupKvcn4Y1zKBYk6ldc_2k>
Subject: [Netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:14:44 -0000
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf-06 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2018-07-10 IETF LC End Date: 2018-07-09 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. However, I have one comment that I would like the authors to address. Major issues: None Minor issues: Sometimes, when a draft updates an existing RFC, people ask whether implementations not implementing the draft are still compliant with the updated RFC. Based on discussions, the consensus seems to be that existing implementations are still compliant, and if one wants to mandate the new features a bis is needed. I would just like to confirm whether that applies also to this draft. If so, perhaps a note indicating that would be useful, in order to avoid discussions in future? Related to that, it would also be good to have an interoperability statement, saying that implementations that implement the draft will still work with implementations that do not. Nits/editorial comments: None
- [Netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-n… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Netconf] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] [Gen-art] Genart last call review o… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Netconf] [Gen-art] Genart last call review o… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] [Gen-art] Genart last call review o… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [Netconf] [Gen-art] Genart last call review o… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Netconf] [Gen-art] Genart last call review o… Martin Bjorklund