IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Adoption call for draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id-02

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 11 August 2022 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42910C1907B9 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BXFwxr5nWzM for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4DBC15C502 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id j63so25952310ybb.13 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks.com; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=Oj/ZlOsvwwnqKYqX2O4Ekq6JfMe+OGdWaPeAwl70elA=; b=dsWFgXahFQ1ayELt1XPLqt2reWozWIyNzEjbTbkcixBj+w9+w+l2gM2CiVU4XoGXUs CKPuPFONLLO0I2pFYzjc/wcYZy75J1Gl+UXPRyAGXkk1pXgs9M/RlGKreH8zrK1ODsEZ sHCsNeROB9/77+bdyAzrD4F+ajMdbmn5bUtqtUpfXPcfpZ7c4RIuJZgydL3hFAH3nZAv oY84uFVnOiYb4TZKgKbohC3I9QeOnQoVywy2qf2JqIYycoMPiDCwUIh6sNuNvB6030Cp iR12tCFvW59JCTV4dtHmPSfF3JN3Oo9O6hY4skNVzFl6sVDzhi0aFonLCZjTrJhZ2uRK paTg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=Oj/ZlOsvwwnqKYqX2O4Ekq6JfMe+OGdWaPeAwl70elA=; b=zw2oSgsTIhXeQ7ohKjSSceQWZvz9Y6zRg3fGooGUufDlvOqaxuL9cwFHIxV+e26qsI auhhLxSngmV7D3roRkyZ0a5Dgw903Qap8ZKYOMYeIgBRzMhETiyB5KclZZhNLGB3K3l6 A4YSp7AQAyl7RnJw+KMk/oSuVqkg5Qb9l1dPi0meeuojWJQTPZAqhjyuZV63y7dd/8jd 5QAM3Gb+m/9ZgCZbFLViGcqIA0GGXs4j3EkZE4MjtRL2RfSN9Y4yD2XJsOAc9f3W3DGM 7CSd29VmT74veZx7jbbooEOPX8w+H0/nhnqqos3agPwUINE4wEGRLW3s/XJFIFOPX8F1 IfSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1TYzEhQoW8MIoSKSIBScxtula+W6D+gJGlkRfxU8DpTh+KG184 /fEB42u97206/GTp/EDhAaneUkRQetjYfq0JIC4jzGnGKw4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6hUFU+H/ceaavc/dZ5oq4UJlTAgG6uu0Gr2/VBuuF/iAQ9UHBqWI1d0wqoDpOTLrxudJO9suu7UpFVBZ62NFw=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6c84:0:b0:67b:5681:413f with SMTP id h126-20020a256c84000000b0067b5681413fmr27385294ybc.64.1660179709585; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0100018287f8dfb8-753b6dc6-6329-44e0-90f4-63b55956f1ad-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100018287f8dfb8-753b6dc6-6329-44e0-90f4-63b55956f1ad-000000@email.amazonses.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 18:01:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQhbfmeRRv2=DGJYs=Sq+0K8ysR8Mgq=giFaoaU91eNkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da848f05e5ecb503"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/6KMNIZaXL63mnFiB6QbYRWYALtc>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption call for draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id-02
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 01:01:54 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:37 AM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:

> NETCONF WG,
>
> This message starts a two week poll ending on Aug 24, to decide if the
> document in the Subject line should be made a WG document or not. Please
> reply-all to this email as to whether or not you support adoption of this
> draft by the WG. Indications that the draft has been read are also
> appreciated.  From the IPR-poll, there is no known IPR associated with this
> draft.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lindblad-netconf-transaction-id
>
>

I have some concerns about WG adoption this draft.

There should be a clear consensus on the problem statement
before any serious discussion of the solution in the draft.

I support a direct (as possible) translation of the RESTCONF mechanisms
defined in RFC 8040 (3.4.1).  Consistent terminology and protocol mechanisms
for NETCONF and RESTCONF are needed for developers and operators.
No additional functionality is needed.

The solution should not impose any new implementation restrictions
that are not already specified in RFC 8040 and RFC 7232.
Only configuration datastores should be in scope (same as RESTCONF).



Thanks,
> Kent (and Mahesh)
>
>
Andy


>
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email