IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netconf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-over-quic-00.txt

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Thu, 26 September 2024 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <010001922ebd0e1a-aeaa92de-73c7-453f-9f0b-0b0150c12829-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBB7C14F6B4 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kRLAjQ2vixBj for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-96.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.96]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C62C14F5E2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 07:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1727360995; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=2HJtwwwXHAM6bSAFwKZS5uvU1i9TMglZcsWa4EH6rFs=; b=FjsjYF83YzjJwP81O8/1B0o3HXUiaeMFdJKD1oAo8EAc7NXvq8v4GVN+R2uu2orL UHzRzAx72LDk0wSpQSOoxoEvt10KSqsdt+b3hPK/KVWhJz7OVBiGbK38M7rvY1KcVRo ZQqXTn1zEgeb/i3nAO6h3nySHrr9Z/ziu30JiQjI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB4131737BDF0BC9CE9B0E8935A06A2@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:29:54 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <010001922ebd0e1a-aeaa92de-73c7-453f-9f0b-0b0150c12829-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <172722605655.189.7998165814409208575@dt-datatracker-6c75f7dfff-hrjh6> <DU2PR02MB10160C2646B53684C9188161788692@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <023FAAE1-9B4B-4364-917F-70985EAE7D1A@viagenie.ca> <01000192298d9e6b-78047b57-e2f8-4359-be77-f7c68e835130-000000@email.amazonses.com> <AM0PR07MB4131737BDF0BC9CE9B0E8935A06A2@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: ::1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2024.09.26-54.240.8.96
Message-ID-Hash: 7YK3OHJIBM5YUUHORP6B3XDKCN5UKIN4
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7YK3OHJIBM5YUUHORP6B3XDKCN5UKIN4
X-MailFrom: 010001922ebd0e1a-aeaa92de-73c7-453f-9f0b-0b0150c12829-000000@amazonses.watsen.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netconf-over-quic-00.txt
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/8A9f3Xv0f1agg_JI7NJUhZEsGm4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Tom,

> On Sep 26, 2024, at 6:46 AM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> Sent: 25 September 2024 15:19
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
>> Sure. We decided to _not_ make any change to the draft from individual to wg -00 so that it will be easier to trace for the wg. And we already have comments from during the adoption call that are being processed.
> 
> It’s for the best that way.
> 
> <tp>
> 
> In some working Groups that is mandatory with the e-mail from the WG Chair explicitly stating that only the name should change, nothing else.
> 
> I think this very wise and would that all WG were that way.  It makes issue tracking and investigation so much simpler.

Indeed, and I wholly concur.  My saying “it's for the best” is just me agreeing with the previous statement without sounding demanding  ;)

FWIW, my “adoption succeeded” message says it, albeit not explicitly.  That message was carefully worded, saying to republish the specific version that went through the adoption call with the new name.  The implicit understanding is that no other change would be present so that all the subsequent updates can be tracked.

Thanks for surfacing this important point.


> Tom Petch

Kent / as co-chair

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status