[Netconf] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just a few minor comments:

Substantive Comments:

§2, 2nd bullet: "Each YANG module and submodule within the library SHOULD have
a revision." Why not MUST? Does it ever make sense not to have a revision? What
are the consequences?

Editorial Comments:

§1, last paragraph: Missing article before "YANG Library" in first sentence.

§2, list item 1: "Efficient for a client to consume." - sentence fragment.
-- List item 3: Why is "NOT" in all-caps?
-- List item 6: The first sentence, while not technically a fragment, seems to
use an understood "you" as the subject. I doubt that is the intent.