IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Question on draft-ietf-netconf-udp-notif-06

Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr> Mon, 25 July 2022 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CA2C157B45 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_HELO_IP_MISMATCH=2.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FyrMTQNW8aR6 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout01-ext2.partage.renater.fr (smtpout01-ext2.partage.renater.fr [194.254.240.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3A6C13CCFA for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr (zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr [194.254.240.25]) by smtpout10.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFEF6415C; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3545214035E; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DED7140388; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr
Received: from zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id WhZY3kja8FYv; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 31.133.130.9 (unknown [194.254.241.249]) by zmtaauth01.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B836214035E; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:42:08 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Alex Huang Feng <alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr>
In-Reply-To: <BE804F00-A1B1-47A1-8A8A-900301B0A5E5@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:42:07 +0200
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E29156A2-F27B-4A60-A729-F7D97FAE6CB7@insa-lyon.fr>
References: <BE804F00-A1B1-47A1-8A8A-900301B0A5E5@cisco.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamState: clean
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamScore: -100
X-Renater-Ptge-SpamCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvddtkedguddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucftgffptefvgfftnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjffevgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlvgigucfjuhgrnhhgucfhvghnghcuoegrlhgvgidrhhhurghnghdqfhgvnhhgsehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueffvddtvddvieekgfffueelteejtdeuveffjeffgfejueffkeelgeevlefgtdeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehmrghrtghushgtohhmrdgtohhmpdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudelgedrvdehgedrvdeguddrvdegleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduleegrddvheegrddvgedurddvgeelpdhhvghlohepfedurddufeefrddufedtrdelpdhmrghilhhfrhhomheptehlvgigucfjuhgrnhhgucfhvghnghcuoegrlhgvgidrhhhurghnghdqfhgvnhhgsehinhhsrgdqlhihohhnrdhfrheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtohepjhgtlhgrrhhkvgepgedttghishgtohdrtghomhesughmrghrtgdrihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvthgtohhnfhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/9QRN5C_DnVc1Vq6s7DOzGZY4ACo>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Question on draft-ietf-netconf-udp-notif-06
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 17:42:18 -0000

Hi Joe,

Thank you for your comments.

We are still working on that implementation and impact analysis of DTLS, so I don’t have the answer yet.
We will get back to you and the mailing list when we have more insights.

Alex


> On 25 Jul 2022, at 16:25, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I was still chewing on the draft while it was being presented, so I didn’t comment at the mic…
> 
> You mentioned the new DTLS piece hasn’t been fully implemented, and you also say a key use case for this work is line card messages staying off the router control plane.
> 
> In light of that, I wonder what DTLS might do to performance or line card firmware weight?  It may be trivial, but from an ops perspective I wonder if there had been any thought or analysis given to these areas?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Joe
> 
> PGP Key : https://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email