[Netconf] FW: AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6022 <draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Thu, 23 September 2010 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FD83A6812 for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TsJOqJPcTctB for <netconf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96ABF3A6A5D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8NHZRoH006446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:35:27 +0200
Received: from demuexc024.nsn-intra.net (demuexc024.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.11]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8NHZQvZ024129; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:35:26 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by demuexc024.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:35:26 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:35:25 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64FCCF30@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6022 <draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
Thread-Index: ActbIGQefLea7v67TKuYULOnjqIwdgACwsBQAAXh8IA=
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2010 17:35:26.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5594A70:01CB5B45]
Subject: [Netconf] FW: AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6022 <draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:35:06 -0000

Dear NETCONF WG,

the NETCONF Monitoring draft is in the AUTH48 phase and the 
editors proposed the changes below as last minute editorial
changes. 

The change on "p 4. list datastore" vs. "list configuration"
has not been posted to the ML before, which solves an 
inconcistency between the sections 2.1.2 and 5. 

We put AUTH48 on hold to get your approval on this. Please 
speak up if you have any strong concerns with this particular 
change by September 27, 2010, 11am EDT.

Mehmet


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com] 
Sent: September-23-10 9:08 AM
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: Mark Scott; netconf-ads@tools.ietf.org;
netconf-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6022
<draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-15.txt> NOW AVAILABLE

Hi,

I have reviewed the document and the changes made so far.  I'm
including new changes in OLD/NEW format below.

RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 2) Section 2: Data Model to Monitor NETCONF
> 
>    A server that implements the data model defined in this document
>    MUST advertise the capability URI
>    "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-monitoring", as described
>    in [RFC6020].
> 
> <!-- [rfced] The above sounds as though 
> "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-monitoring" was registered
in RFC
> 6020.  Perhaps this could be rephrased as:
> 
>         A server that implements the data model defined in this
>         document
("urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-monitoring") 
>         MUST advertise the capability URI as described in <xref
>         target="RFC6020"/>.
> -->

I see the point.  Actually, the entire paragraph is redundant, since
YANG defines what MUST be advertised.  But if we want to make as few
changes as possible, the proposed text is fine.


p. 4  (the list is called "list datatore", not "list configuration"
       in the data model)
OLD:

   The /netconf-state/datastores subtree contains the list of available
   datastores for the NETCONF server and includes information on their
   lock state.

   configuration
       /name
       /locks

NEW:

   The /netconf-state/datastores subtree contains the list of available
   datastores for the NETCONF server and includes information on their
   lock state.

   datastore
       /name
       /locks


p. 6
OLD:

      Identifies transport for each session.  The transport is

NEW:

      Identifies the transport for each session.  The transport is


p. 6 (make terminology consitent)
OLD:

   in-rpcs (yang:zero-based-counter32)
      Number of correct <rpc> requests received.

NEW:

   in-rpcs (yang:zero-based-counter32)
      Number of correct <rpc> messages received.


p. 7
OLD:

   in-rpcs (yang:zero-based-counter32)
      Number of correct <rpc> requests received.

NEW:

   in-rpcs (yang:zero-based-counter32)
      Number of correct <rpc> messages received.


p. 13
OLD:

  revision 2010-06-22 {

NEW:

  revision 2010-09-23 {

(or maybe the date the RFC is published.  The important thing is that
it is not 2010-06-22)


p. 18
OLD:

   list partial-locks {

NEW:

   list partial-lock {


p. 19
OLD:

   leaf-list locked-nodes {

NEW:

   leaf-list locked-node {



/martin