Re: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf review

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Tue, 15 May 2018 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AD312DA07 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBda_9_4SoVl for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA0712D886 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f6-v6so287040wmc.4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hYBa7X7V9vQvePqOr0bafVq88ye18ZfNO4OiQVuH1ak=; b=bmcYB/u7XVjpyFpEcsx0VjeFuDcYgyziwnRcH0X7DE4+nq6TT5z3ZVOQJuf20hHJve U536ReAHXc7Y38wnjyIofT9y48vNTqtzCSlLiXNab2S2NcbdnCjg30WfHfsFwP9o+EQ9 +vZWvXcHIlelaYYdVOL2htE8rF/ygSbmwJQD6qxDwsm+mu2+vtnxK/xqpWfusyc8zLHu Ej/UWSWrKXCPakLqEqleY9rV35Et8Iu5TNdu4p7c0bTrHvemmPedDKPJ3S5yiDdvmyqs B4ToT/cBF6BxImHqOhFZwtvyLYeL8qMObl8nMWycmV1m1w7YafqrxU/HkrmmKq7sB7Ii swdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hYBa7X7V9vQvePqOr0bafVq88ye18ZfNO4OiQVuH1ak=; b=kUO8mMmpDQxooop48nf6NlN8NYrAHRf6Pi8yCdXHdKOVK6zV1PfoKLA7l/CaBDvTp+ hkQCSs4hH8i725sGsMzWoS01r2poAaHC54D8SRLfYgyogaLCPFJE0WriupB83SQq/Jrt 3e0SCcuFiAGYFiBTxFO+sQoHMIHtYFmWP1Aji0d9dlGIbC05h2bBqhEbRWnetMy2fEQf bLSRkiAZkiMtgw05m01lQhXg8gCVmiajMabd/Bwlb4NBwE0XYLqmDnXQlMeHYVbKo89t rtk1DCYgzpXZV7R6WlfIr0gqe6x7oQMMqCUBEhWz1wQoet5JfKkjKJvauTXhhzfQ9JjQ sd3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwf2qWgdDJXpt9IDvtdb4hQ/E4sYV6nOyoLTQsDqXYewb4XPWatH nEHImWbzyIt7+JfztavsCTI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqFpT7huj+EpYA+2fsCRkytBB2m5tUHaUq16erjJGn1b6PICotTfld1soiNAe6xCVAVVTNbSA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b78a:: with SMTP id h132-v6mr6996040wmf.21.1526382853773; Tue, 15 May 2018 04:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.28.7.36] ([195.238.226.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19-v6sm17137856wrz.7.2018.05.15.04.14.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 May 2018 04:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180515094242.hof7vmtqyhxcfrca@elstar.local>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 13:14:12 +0200
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BA34DEED-D6AD-4D16-83CE-1B4B48276EB1@gmail.com>
References: <69877EC3-DE3E-4428-A2A2-56A2AC29CDCD@gmail.com> <20180515094242.hof7vmtqyhxcfrca@elstar.local>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/AHW8wL4wRnVc4UTEPWYclwdTzTA>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf review
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 11:14:17 -0000


> On May 15, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:36:16AM +0200, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>> 
>> 2. This is a follow-up to the discussion on the mailing list. Reading through this draft, RFC7950, RFC6020, and rfc7895bis, it is not clear if a NETCONF server that wants to support both YANG 1.0 and YANG 1.1, needs to do from a schema advertisement perspective. Does it advertise the schemas as part of <hello> and as part of yang-library:1.1? Does it advertise both YANG 1.0 and 1.1 models in both the modes?
>> 
> 
> How does this relate to NMDA?

If we agree this needs to be clarified, we can decide next where to put the clarification.

> 
> /js

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com