Re: [netconf] Adoption-suitability for draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications

Hi,

I am trying to understand the problem statement in this draft.
It seems to be that RFC 8639 does not provide enough configuration
capability
to specify how notifications from different subscriptions should be bundled
together into a single message.  There is no discussion of why bundling
notifications needs to be standardized, or what benefits it provides over
the current RFC 5277 notification message definition.

This approach seems to add a lot of complexity without adding much benefit.

Andy

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 3:19 PM Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:

>
> NETCONF WG,
>
> Per the previous email sent moments ago, the chairs would like to solicit
> input on the following draft:
>
>    Title: Bulk Subscription to YANG Event Notification
>    Link: https://tools.ietf.org/html/
> draft-wang-netconf-bulk-subscribed-notifications
>    Abstract:
>
>       This document defines a YANG data model and associated mechanism that
>       allows subscriber applications to bulk subscribe to publishers' event
>       streams based on bundle group information such as bundle size and
>       bundle latency.  This allows the publishers to report multiple
>       notifications in a single bundling message.
>
>
> In particular, please discuss adoption-suitability as it regards to the
> following questions:
>
>     1) is the problem important for the NETCONF WG to solve?
>     2) is the draft a suitable basis for the work?
>
>
> PS: this message is itself not an adoption poll, but rather an attempt to
> gauge interest/support for a potential future adoption poll.
>
> NETCONF Chairs
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>