[netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6241 (7624)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 10 May 2024 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB349C14F6F7; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pakFxo1lSkCQ; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DC86C14F6A0; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id E5590F5D50; Fri, 10 May 2024 10:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si, rob.enns@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, andy@yumaworks.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240510173728.E5590F5D50@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 10:37:28 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: ZZPFCQSBHWXIBQL72SGUE4R3ZSTFQSQQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZZPFCQSBHWXIBQL72SGUE4R3ZSTFQSQQ
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: iesg@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6241 (7624)
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/BO_PcvICS1EqNHFeuFOq3h1yAE0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6241, "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7624 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si> Date Reported: 2023-08-31 Rejected by: Mahesh Jethanandani (IESG) Section: 4.3. Original Text ------------- <rpc-reply xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <rpc-error> <error-type>rpc</error-type> <error-tag>missing-attribute</error-tag> <error-severity>error</error-severity> <error-info> <bad-attribute>message-id</bad-attribute> <bad-element>rpc</bad-element> </error-info> </rpc-error> </rpc-reply> Corrected Text -------------- <nc:rpc-reply xmlns:nc="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> <nc:rpc-error> <nc:error-type>rpc</nc:error-type> <nc:error-tag>missing-attribute</nc:error-tag> <nc:error-severity>error</nc:error-severity> <nc:error-info> <nc:bad-attribute>message-id</nc:bad-attribute> <nc:bad-element>nc:rpc</nc:bad-element> </nc:error-info> </nc:rpc-error> </nc:rpc-reply> Notes ----- The original error response is referring to the NETCONF messages layer attribute "message-id", which does not belong to any XML namespace. The response is not properly encoding xs:QName values of elements "bad-attribute" and "bad-element" by placing them both into the default XML namespace. Proposed new text (while verbose) ensures that the values are placed into their respective proper XML namespaces. --VERIFIER NOTES-- The original error response is valid when validated against netconf XSD defined in RFC 4741. -------------------------------------- RFC6241 (draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Publication Date : June 2011 Author(s) : R. Enns, Ed., M. Bjorklund, Ed., J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., A. Bierman, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Configuration Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netconf] [Errata Rejected] RFC6241 (7624) RFC Errata System