IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] a joint discussion on dynamic subscription

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 14 June 2018 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B852E130E34 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZGALL1aQWAR for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E7DC130E30 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 08:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1031; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1528990550; x=1530200150; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=D2yZlgqnyryCzoDVhge2kQOMksqsvz4/iaBUhbrVdio=; b=MZBbJGeRANC8P9clelbULdfiGLe2v/rryjK0SRNUtZ42J2izA9oUGQ6G r7QrL6LVrxF/Jxhca7SrjVSX7SPZNH/DohUc7qDz0v9axUN83FQbeFRoX rweoawAzCw6ATBf18hBuEc8ExwONwIK6VrWwTibF5sfnivoHDuqXoTj1b w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DnAQAsiiJb/5ldJa1ZAxkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEHAQEBAQGDSGJ/MphEgX+UbYF4Cx+ETQKCRSE2FgECAQEBAQEBAm0cDIUoAQEBAwE6PwUJAgIBCA4CBQMNERAbFyUCBA4NgxyBdwisXohGgWMFBYhHgVQ/g20uhF83JoUPApkOCQKOd41AkRoCERMBgSQjATGBUnAVgn+GL4ofkA6BGgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,222,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="399918910"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jun 2018 15:35:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5EFZm1n023041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:35:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:35:48 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:35:48 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "Zhengguangying (Walker) (zhengguangying@huawei.com)" <zhengguangying@huawei.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] a joint discussion on dynamic subscription
Thread-Index: AdQCx01ede4gaRHPTgG2WyMdkd0r2gARka+AADD1vgAAAsT/AAACxI2AAAe7UgAABvBhUP//6DGAgABCn+A=
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:35:48 +0000
Message-ID: <8c227fbd8b7e4d2d8d401d658e66cd8e@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <20180614.091828.21142123428745204.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180614.103746.8291316293283106.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180614095701.74rqetmhark3tzpd@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20180614.153824.1029993696264171685.mbj@tail-f.com> <7d8930974acf4fd28b7e60a24c5d2196@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20180614153153.4mnogshp56wyd3h4@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20180614153153.4mnogshp56wyd3h4@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/CKH_B4QJVCxPVR_yQjY9F2IVj7Q>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] a joint discussion on dynamic subscription
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:35:52 -0000

> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, June 14, 2018 11:32 AM
> 
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 03:04:01PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> >
> > I would argue that the server and publisher are the same (see below for
> why).  If this is true perhaps we could define the term "distributed publisher"
> which matches to the term "Subscribed Domain" in draft-ietf-netconf-udp-
> pub-channel.  A distributed publisher would be a type of publisher, inheriting
> all requirements for that device from subscribed-notifications.
> >
> 
> If A and B are the same, why do we need to introduce C?

I don't think it is required to introduce "C".  It is just that "C" might be a valid subset of {A/B}.  We can let the authors assert whether this valid subset requires a new term.

Eric

 
> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status