IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Netconf over QUIC

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E1F3A1260 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ElF-bz8TZam1 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur05on2111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.21.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABCD93A125F for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Gbd4e9V/t+a+LgyK+B1l2aLHRvVfrFCF0KK1yR0dDc+B2p+JbFMIVRaC3XonUIJJ4xttddqBXEeGgj+Nz7Oh/W6OJSY3h22o5cZNpMq0lpDqRTFJ2QcN6eLRllHv3enPe6LesjD2NpMErfjmcBbChGu1J3VSLombsPJGTBmbWBx4hGoeAQNEo4h53vivdb7AzuDRVzccGHVQV8/Fgr8EKirH37o6VE+emU2zlv+bIcjBLe04cwnbolZy4kiv4I5bZnMS85NGqAeca1+R136ydwLICvf1q0NcPkenCX/0rq+piSO1xCxTgMBN3uCGDU2urkdy74FbDqow/u/qPPgMUA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=H9ufQcu1P5T4o3navcaFbjPjAnK4zG4axmS7XnUjd4k=; b=KR++oB+lfWpAxWtiD5LMM2DHKvbRzoTDtVDQmm45a9ITvDQ0ZrafZeRWetNuhdK/OWtndJJ7MOuH43CcM6Ywsd6ks7AlpBC62+qoX5vrmB8y04gahlnedJLl+aPBYGMIH6IlhdJq4F/VjgMN9q170AgXJOr15rBAdsefM0gOfangy/ubgXENWOYwIMAQqEwB/VXvdiKTgCmFxoc4TNoJ/4QFJfjmsoU8g0a4FnVRA2ARrNSeUlVnrqoeOBj5gK6mEZ0tAv2jotNExzRbLWYYSTC3ju7+xIjWCX/m2+9v+cT1UkxCWAQABWr224Qgg3qTO6FxFRCchnCnwb4JKN7JEw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=H9ufQcu1P5T4o3navcaFbjPjAnK4zG4axmS7XnUjd4k=; b=Q1WDBsofvQIzu/OdZd/aPtxCFEl9cylafJXnlyPa4i8bKTh/wmf4i+6yQsgVo6fw+sRtOrsP98p3HOW622d1gqv6nUP4bIdijYFwPc5BYCNDZ9fq7H88hdvk2OAgGFbaBRtzE/ciTZ9ozTVZBUpaDIyEQVwfcDYROlMb6RsRLxk=
Received: from VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:133::7) by VI1PR0701MB3056.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:86::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.6; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:20 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6163:5bba:8389:75f8]) by VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6163:5bba:8389:75f8%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.015; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:20 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Netconf over QUIC
Thread-Index: AQHWq78ipVhuz0kW80mk+IBTiIy20KmqScyAgAFoL0o=
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:20 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB625616A0D075A351414B5C9AA0160@VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <AM7PR07MB6248E0069EB6B2A2A441100BA0190@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>, <0100017566724b83-8a93024f-4c00-45bd-8651-20fc9697ec27-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100017566724b83-8a93024f-4c00-45bd-8651-20fc9697ec27-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: watsen.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;watsen.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.146.121.140]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4b9e6b34-586e-43cc-a068-08d87a9c29dd
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR0701MB3056:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR0701MB3056E164484DF79A61EFDA10A0160@VI1PR0701MB3056.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: OfyZgvCORdLnfbkr3O39UHGG5u4h9OZmBuR3LLLpzjWrNrmpfC0yDZZe+8saRtwP+sULxnvb2ecQ0oq3OI8lRMZoz4YZuhXCmtPfvb3qQkOc81h3nvnEJ+E4PG/YaUOxER9SZB5e+67gDHd4JUaaYu+Tlld3CalcmYavLBny/YutbaO8qu/jfnW31pfCcQKZ5c93iB7zOEOZDWj6D7mXJ+ghI0ghcgUNEk/WSFAcE0sfEV9YuMRz5UPC2htXQMIw0U1+fAq+421i0Zfjp+qFpcj3N7F/O/CFeknCjUdiXosWR/fF42mUi9RdFMjGbrukGLS96F9pyhtWVv16sjHLRHbO8g16TBgF9K4f0Fdkxdq6zueXQYPEZ1kCwcWRQTZv9f0K+k9vAcXDfeh6nwCgbw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(7116003)(6506007)(3480700007)(9686003)(26005)(7696005)(53546011)(186003)(33656002)(52536014)(86362001)(2906002)(478600001)(71200400001)(966005)(4326008)(83380400001)(64756008)(55016002)(66446008)(66946007)(66574015)(76116006)(8676002)(5660300002)(66556008)(316002)(91956017)(66476007)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4b9e6b34-586e-43cc-a068-08d87a9c29dd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Oct 2020 17:17:20.7936 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Pp3zY4ewqUaN/jbpn6wEOblEPqiRwt8AoB0DxelYrM6hQuXcy4yjkTq02U9H7pSMVEiO5cg03n69cNCSWh7JNA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR0701MB3056
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/eRl81DDX7oLDORlKkultaO6ecXw>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Netconf over QUIC
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:17:26 -0000

From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Sent: 26 October 2020 19:46

On Oct 26, 2020, at 1:42 PM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com<mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com>> wrote:

I see an I-D aimed at the QUIC WG proposing QUIC as a transport for Netconf.  Is this something that the Netconf WG should be involved in ?  I do not recognise the names of the authors of this I-D!

Tom Petch

<tp>
Kent 
some more details
=======================================
Network Working Group                                             J. Dai
INTERNET-DRAFT                                                   X. Wang
Intended Status: Proposed Standard                                Y. Kou
Expires: April 26, 2021                                          L. Zhou
                      China Information Communication Technologies Group
                                                        October 26, 2020

                  Using NETCONF over QUIC connection 
                       draft-dai-quic-netconf-03

Abstract

   The Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) provides mechanisms to  
   install, manipulate, and delete the configuration of network devices.
   At present, almost all implementations of NETCONF are based on TCP 
   based protocol. QUIC, a new UDP-based transport protocol, can 
   facilitate to improve the transportation performance, information 
   security and resource utility when being used as an infrastructure layer
   of NETCONF. This document describes how to use the QUIC protocol as the 
   transport protocol of NETCONF(It is so called NETCONFoQUIC).
=============================================

Tom Petch

I haven’t seen the draft but, per your description, the NETCONF's charter [1] says that the WG is “responsible” for:

c) The transports and encodings used by the data model-driven protocols.

I don’t think this is an exclusive responsibility, but it would be odd for another WG to take on this work (especially without involving us!), likely to the point of an objection.

FWIW, what the CORE WG did is different, as they defined a whole new protocol (COAP), which happens to resemble RESTCONF.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netconf/about/

Kent // as co-chair

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status