IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 09 August 2018 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B14D130E7A for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tRi_lLSnta0V for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A221130E7D for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1100; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1533834301; x=1535043901; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=5UbItVy+9b6j6n0G/RBIZUtEFtSUeMru5jUYC6iTS5E=; b=IqDrJprkwAI7+r2bNUFzVm7Fh/mqcQfXlms3sB0V4ZXOwichFrEUGn71 ORDCM5WspwlcCvjIGPd+kSKbmbsHF1iifMtLcTzo2uUeZbJubOjEV5CeH lJorSqpe/72pTHipAbfwFFxgL/XnzGWZ6M8DDxtiW/jAMI7QOB5N1W22q s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CSAQDuc2xb/49dJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNOY38oCpgygg2VfYF6CxgLhANGAoMhITUXAQIBAQIBAQJtHAyFNwEBAQMBAQE4NAkCBQsCAQgOKBAnCyUCBAENBQiDGYF4CA+seIpMBYkUF4FBP4QkgxsBAYFLhWwCmksJAo9HjjqPTYMKAhEUgSQeATaBUnAVO4Jpgk2ISIU+b40BgRsBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,215,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="425523126"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2018 17:05:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w79H4xEc002405 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Aug 2018 17:05:00 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:04:59 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 9 Aug 2018 13:04:59 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "mjethanandani@gmail.com" <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02
Thread-Index: AQHULsD9DxGRjcaenEy8jHDaoiDafaS1bNUAgAHog4CAAFMk0A==
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 17:04:58 +0000
Message-ID: <e85237b37ea244c7bdbacb428cbfaccb@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <E26D8ABC-35DD-4DF6-BAF2-3A9E77BE5772@gmail.com> <20180808.085812.1249848609556014485.mbj@tail-f.com> <35A31A23-2FFE-4DB0-82FE-C3C54DF9B513@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <35A31A23-2FFE-4DB0-82FE-C3C54DF9B513@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.151, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/DtZWNqYYFHN8ReIDE9y-r_49-kw>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2018 17:05:04 -0000

> > While I do support the adoption of this document, I wonder if this WG
> > really should add more work.  We have ~14 active drafts that we've
> > been working on for a very long time, and they are still not done,
> > mainly b/c of lack of reviews (which is due to the fact that the WG
> > have been busy with other docs).  I would prefer that the WG put some
> > effort into finishing the current set of documents before adopting new
> > work.
> 
> This is a good point, and one that I've raised in the past as well.
> 
> I don't mind adopting these drafts now, but I request that the authors restrain
> pushing on them hard until after the current backlog is dealt with.
> 
> Let's focus on getting the zerotouch, yang-push++, and client-server drafts
> done.  That's 12 drafts, and a whole lot of pages!

This makes lots of sense.  I support adopting the drafts with this caveat.

Eric
 
> Kent // chair
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email