Re: [netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8525 (6484)

Hi,

Wow, this is obviously a bug.

I am not sure it can be fixed with an errata however.  Perhaps "hold
for document update"?

/martin

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8525,
> "YANG Library".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6484
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jernej Tuljak <jernej.tuljak@mg-soft.si>
> 
> Section: 4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      revision 2016-04-09 {
>        description
>          "Initial revision.";
>        reference
>          "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
>      }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      revision 2016-06-21 {
>        description
>          "Initial revision.";
>        reference
>          "RFC 7895: YANG Module Library";
>      }
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Initial revision of ietf-yang-library YANG module was 2016-06-21, not 2016-04-09.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8525 (draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : YANG Library
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund, J. Schoenwaelder, K. Watsen, R. Wilton
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Configuration
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf