Re: [netconf] Adoption call for draft-kwatsen-netconf-http-client-server-04

Hi,

In principle I wouldn't mind a document like this.  But if the HTTP
experts have concerns, and based on the contents of the model (*)
perhaps it is better to add the necessary nodes directly to the
higher-level modules (e.g, ietf-restconf-server for the server nodes).

(*) The grouping for the server doesn't really add much, imo.
Basically it has a seemingly arbitrary selection of headers to control
(in fact just 'Server'), which protocol version to support, and a
per-server list of "basic" username/passwords (which is probably not
a common way to configure authentication).

The client grouping also doens't add much, with the possible exception
of the proxy settings; perhaps these nodes could be specified in a
generic grouping.

/martin

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi WG,
> 
> The author has posted a -04 version of the draft, and believes that it
> ready for WG adoption.
> 
> This starts a 2 week poll ending on November 4, to decide whether this
> document should be made a WG document or not. Please reply to this
> email whether or not you support adoption of this draft by the
> WG. Indications that the draft has been read will be also be
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mahesh Jethanandani
> mjethanandani@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> 