[netconf] RFC 9643 on YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 11 October 2024 01:09 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58896C14F6EA; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id BA3DB3B873; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20241011010922.BA3DB3B873@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:09:22 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: EC7IQOUAHNLBMHQURH2XWR3VM3FDFNPT
X-Message-ID-Hash: EC7IQOUAHNLBMHQURH2XWR3VM3FDFNPT
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc5
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] RFC 9643 on YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP Servers
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/F77py8Uz6bhG37k5hMwQfLfg2Hw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9643
Title: YANG Groupings for TCP Clients
and TCP Servers
Author: K. Watsen,
M. Scharf
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: October 2024
Mailbox: kent+ietf@watsen.net,
michael.scharf@hs-esslingen.de
Pages: 29
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-26.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9643
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9643
This document presents three YANG 1.1 modules to support the
configuration of TCP clients and TCP servers. The modules include
basic parameters of a TCP connection relevant for client or server
applications, as well as client configuration required for traversing
proxies. The data models defined by these modules may be used
directly (e.g., to define a specific TCP client or TCP server) or in
conjunction with the configuration defined for higher level protocols
that depend on TCP (e.g., SSH, TLS, etc.). Examples of higher level
protocol configuration designed to be used in conjunction with this
configuration are in RFCs 9644 and 9645.
This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC