Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> (YANG Library) to Proposed Standard

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Thu, 02 August 2018 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF187130EFA; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_97-aLyiarN; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anna.localdomain (anna.eecs.jacobs-university.de [IPv6:2001:638:709:5::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D524B130EF8; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id D6F8323A9EC5; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 11:13:48 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, netconf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, netconf-chairs@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20180802091348.5j3zpf45nzulszva@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, netconf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, netconf-chairs@ietf.org
References: <152899335818.26447.7759890925422555917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9ad91163-ca97-5db1-1f6d-e365f819db10@labn.net> <5363EB75-95BC-4407-9BFA-3D97EAC440D3@gmail.com> <114e3335-a976-4a84-58e0-8817a06324c1@labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <114e3335-a976-4a84-58e0-8817a06324c1@labn.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/FpYD_yQ4Hf5Kxhgg2YFhCG4YJUM>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> (YANG Library) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 09:13:52 -0000

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 04:19:41PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote:

> All this means is that  draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis should note it updates
> RFC 7950 in the header and abstract...

I think there are different interpretations what the Updates: header
means. And in this case, the "update" is even conditional, i.e., you
have to implement rfc7895bis if you do implement NMDA - but if you
don't, then rfc7895 still works just fine.

> Your read of the update to RFC7950 is that it should now reference
> rfc7895bis in Section 5.6.4. Is that correct? How is that different
> from 7895bis obsoleting 7895, and thus all references to 7895 should
> now be to 7895bis?

It is conditional to the implementation of NMDA.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>