Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 04 June 2018 10:17 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EBF126BF6; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 03:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tk3weSu_iMnt; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 03:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02686126579; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 03:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-80-27.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [212.85.80.27]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 832801AE0309; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 12:17:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 12:17:48 +0200
Message-Id: <20180604.121748.1873023460220711310.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: rwilton@cisco.com
Cc: rohitrranade@huawei.com, netconf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <a497b165-1f78-2d2f-9563-01fbb39619df@cisco.com>
References: <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBB4569@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <a497b165-1f78-2d2f-9563-01fbb39619df@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/GRf1hATNB8TGEz_z4CnOwD6WDFM>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 10:17:53 -0000
Hi Two comments inline. Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Rohit, authors, > > I think that these are valid clarifications. I've reworded them > slightly, and moved the ancestor node text to the YANG module > instead. I also think that the ancestor node text generically covers > the config filter clarification that you raised previously. > > Hence, I propose the following diff to the NETCONF NMDA draft: > > rwilton@rwilton-lnx:~/netconf-wg/netconf-nmda$ git diff --staged > diff --git a/ietf-netconf-nmda.yang b/ietf-netconf-nmda.yang > index f2929b9..72a674a 100644 > --- a/ietf-netconf-nmda.yang > +++ b/ietf-netconf-nmda.yang > @@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ module ietf-netconf-nmda { > by get-data must satisfy all filters, i.e., the filter > criteria are logically ANDed. > > + Any ancestor nodes (including list keys) of nodes matched by > + the filter are included in the response. > + > The 'with-origin' parameter is only valid for an operational > datastore. If 'with-origin' is used with an invalid datastore, > then the server MUST return an <rpc-error> element with an > @@ -193,7 +196,7 @@ module ietf-netconf-nmda { > description > "Filter based on the 'origin' annotation. A node matches > the filter if its 'origin' annotation is not derived > - from and not equal to all of the given filter values."; > + from and not equal to any of the given filter values."; > } > } > > diff --git a/nmda-netconf.org b/nmda-netconf.org > index e44e2c7..100e173 100644 > --- a/nmda-netconf.org > +++ b/nmda-netconf.org > @@ -129,14 +129,17 @@ The "config-filter" parameter can be used to > retrieve only "config > true" or "config false" nodes. > > The "origin-filter" parameter, which can be present multiple times, > -selects nodes matching any of the given values. The > -"negated-origin-filter", which can be present multiple times, selects > -nodes that do not match all given values. The "origin-filter" > -and "negated-origin-filter" parameters cannot be used together. > +selects nodes with origins matching, or derived from, any of the > given I would prefer: selects nodes with origins equal to, or derived from, any of the given IMO, the term "match" in the original text means "equal to or derived-from", as explained in the data model. The term "match" is problematic unless it is explained, b/c some people will think it means "equal to". (Noone will think that "matches the regular expression" means "equal to the regular expression" though...) Conclusion: always avoid the term "match". > +values. The "negated-origin-filter", which can be present multiple > +times, selects nodes with origins that do not match, and are not > +derived from, any of the given values. The "origin-filter" and > +"negated-origin-filter" parameters cannot be used together. > > The "max-depth" parameter can be used by the client to limit the > number of sub-tree levels that are returned in the reply. > > Note to the authors, for the negative-origin-filter, I've also changed > "all" to "any" (which changes the semantics, but I think it was wrong > before). Agree that "any" is correct. But does it really change the semantics? "all" sounds quite odd, but isn't the end result the same? /martin > > Similar updates will need to also be done to RESTCONF, but let's agree > the NETCONF text first. > > Thanks, > Rob > > > On 01/06/2018 10:10, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Section 3.1.1 > > > > OLD: > > > > The "origin-filter" parameter, which can be present multiple times, > > > > selects nodes matching any of the given values. The > > > > "negated-origin-filter", which can be present multiple times, selects > > > > nodes that do not match all given values. > > > > NEW: > > > > The "origin-filter" parameter, which can be present multiple times, > > > > selects nodes which are derived from or matching any of the given > > values. The > > > > "negated-origin-filter", which can be present multiple times, selects > > > > nodes which are not derived from and do not match all given values. > > > > When a data-node matching the filter is selected, the configuration > > ancestors > > > > (if any) and list key leafs (if any), even if they do not match the > > filter, are also returned. > > > > Consider two origins such as “learned” and “derived-from-learned”. > > > > “derived-from-learned” is derived from learned origin. > > > > Using the origin filters it is not possible to get nodes belonging to > > “learned” > > > > only as the nodes of derived origin are automatically selected. > > > > Notes: > > > > The text in 3.1.1 did not include the “derived-from” logic for > > selection , while in the data-model definition it was present. > > > > We can also add clarification about the ancestor and key being > > output, even if though they do match the filter, since the leaf > > > > matches the filter. > > > > Example : We can use the RFC 8342 Appendix C.2 BGP Example > > > > <rpc message-id="101" > > > > xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> > > > > <get-data xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-nmda" > > > > xmlns:ds="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-datastores"> > > > > <datastore>ds:running</datastore> > > > > <subtree-filter> > > > > <bgp xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-nmda"/> > > > > </subtree-filter> > > > > <negated-origin-filter>intended</negated-origin-filter> > > > > <with-origin>true</with-origin> > > > > </get-data> > > > > </rpc> > > > > <rpc-reply message-id="101" > > > > xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> > > > > <data xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-netconf-nmda"> > > > > <bgp xmlns:or="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-origin" > > > > or:origin="or:intended"> > > > > <peer> > > > > <name>2001:db8::2:3</name> > > > > <local-as or:origin="or:default">64501</local-as> > > > > <peer-as or:origin="or:default">64502</peer-as> > > > > <local-port or:origin="or:system">60794</local-port> > > > > <remote-port or:origin="or:default">179</remote-port> > > > > <state>established</state> > > > > </peer> > > > > </bgp> > > > > </data> > > > > </rpc-reply> > > > > With Regards, > > > > Rohit R Ranade > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Netconf mailing list > > Netconf@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf >
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Kent Watsen
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-netco… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Robert Wilton
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Robert Wilton
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Rohit R Ranade
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [Netconf] Editorial change-2 for draft-ietf-n… Martin Bjorklund