IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (3821)

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 09 December 2013 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5F61AE5A5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:08:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RMddwcMj6IF for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307641AE5A8 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.47]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9372320045; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:08:00 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RHJTHip3eYU6; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:08:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EC62003E; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:07:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id C81F829F65B2; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:07:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 22:07:52 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Message-ID: <20131209210752.GA70828@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, rob.enns@gmail.com, mbj@tail-f.com, andy.bierman@brocade.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, mehmet.ersue@nsn.com, jonathan@hansfords.net, netconf@ietf.org
References: <20131206100737.B33EB7FC383@rfc-editor.org> <52A62972.4010001@bwijnen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52A62972.4010001@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: rob.enns@gmail.com, joelja@bogus.com, netconf@ietf.org, andy.bierman@brocade.com
Subject: Re: [Netconf] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6241 (3821)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:08:17 -0000

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 09:34:58PM +0100, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
> We have a set of 3 new errata reported to RFC6241.
> See: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6241&rec_status=15&presentation=table
> 
> We would like to hear from the authors/editors what their
> opinion is on the reported errata.
> 
> It is probably best to report your views to the netconf mailing list.
> but if you rather disuss it here first, that is OK too. We probably
> have to repeat the discussion on the mlist later if we do, so best to
> do it on the mailing list. It will hopefully trigger views from others aswell.

I think it would help a lot if there would be a motivation or some
sort of an explanation in addition to the OLD NEW text. As it is, I
have to guess what the submitter wants to achieve with these errata.
Since these are technical errata, it should be possible to describe
the problem/bug that is being fixed. It seems that the submitter is
trying to address multiple issues in those changes. Anyway, an
explanation would have been nice to have.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email