IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] YangPush now

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 13 July 2018 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D62130E0E for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 01:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1TqyICkSyec0 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 01:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA851130E9A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 01:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=996; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531471850; x=1532681450; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=G0HqWl33ytKNCNJwpZGoR7qSFODaKf+V4HjM+KzaSOc=; b=m3icbUTuofs9hzUF8tNTO3j90Oj33QEioCBUHFmuuurNRjfTc0U2f7GV rN0wYuKtfzkmRRyCnmteifCiYPfHffFqaVecXyVJ+u3y9Lw/1jU69JPYK jXTKYSNnopVYDpXhHA/ouXHVMYGa4yhb/H1u1L6yCGWBG70nCF3RX/Q1w A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B0AQDTZkhb/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYMfgXoShCOIY406CCSXLwuEbAKCbjgUAQIBAQIBAQJtKIU3AQUjFVELDgoCAiYCAlcGAQwIAQGDHIIAqTaBLoRbhWOBC4lOP4ERJwyCXod8glUCjROMRgmPIQaBQ4QPgkeFSIw/hVWBWCEmgSwzGggbFYMlgzUBCY0UPoxEAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,347,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="5086917"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jul 2018 08:50:48 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.105] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-105.cisco.com [10.63.23.105]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6D8oknD018919; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:50:47 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <20180708100310.gn3xaol66f7c7lo5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20180708.180552.1582913595227099806.mbj@tail-f.com> <20180708175359.mdcjgvddb453e2fc@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <20180708.202727.1096638437748786994.mbj@tail-f.com> <B0DEB8BF-A652-43E5-8F35-A9732F4FE04A@juniper.net> <6d12e0fb-7bcc-8533-f783-f4d5fb4b0ce2@ericsson.com> <683740ff-2bb1-c702-6cd8-ea2eb4bf733a@cisco.com> <CABCOCHRiZTE8GSHvQrbRTnBVjciRqPVco1aTXHmZqFTWef5+iQ@mail.gmail.com> <2590ad5e-26cd-6955-fb3f-677a05035606@sit.fraunhofer.de> <82693DB7-91C7-4172-A3CE-FDA3A638E191@juniper.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ef2b8a81-9344-ba8a-466e-300e6827adb7@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:50:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <82693DB7-91C7-4172-A3CE-FDA3A638E191@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/GtYymwLDZt-_XrnQZiAv5LjHE4Q>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] YangPush now
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:50:53 -0000

Hi,

It might be useful (at least to me), if the draft authors could 
explicitly indicate what their preference is, and also which of the 
choices below they think would lead to the work completing most quickly.

Thanks,
Rob


On 12/07/2018 19:48, Kent Watsen wrote:
>> I would like to strongly +1 retaining the configured subscriptions (not
>> necessarily in the Push draft itself for the sake of expediting WGLC or
>> modularity)
> Ah, so here's another hum question: with or without yang push.
>
> hums now are:
>
>   1. dynamic subscriptions ~ configured subscriptions
>     a. dynamic first, then configured (published sequentially)
>     b. dynamic and configure together (published in parallel)
>
>   2. subscribed-notifications ~ yang-push
>     a. SN first, then YP  (published sequentially)
>     b. SN and YP together (published in parallel)
>
> Eric/Alex: please include a slide with this somewhere in your preso.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent // chair
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email