Re: [Netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01

"Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <timjenki@cisco.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <timjenki@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9A0126DD9 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELEtFAR3AgFw for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B6231321C4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17952; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503409318; x=1504618918; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=O8KX+WW9Ci+Hee8T6fKD3nX0tUg9w285siysLa624pk=; b=Pn1SOqpElenGQ+Lhv0FgaEr7EFyFlOMK5MlFSo7IpSuduxjZLOfVW9f7 MgLgawLHNE6GsXv4vdSuOQA5HYmPrN4zr5susSP2poiFlJKjJyEJxwP11 RExZEiWBmlHvRFp7lkO+lijI2/5MfricSbh6vVDdUpKKkLUymJFPdpxRY E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DdAABYNJxZ/4sNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9rZIEVB44MkBiBTCKQZoU5DoIEIQEKhRsCGoQJPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMjKxgOAwIQAgEIDgMDAQINHgICAi8BHQgCBAENAQQBHASJLGQQrEGCJieLNQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2DKoICgUyBYysLgnGDJoEaARIBLwcJgnMwgjEFmCGINAKHU4xuDIIEWYUJim6WKAEPEDh/C3cVSRIBgjyCSByBZ3YBB4hbgSMBgQ4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,412,1498521600"; d="scan'208,217";a="288896025"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Aug 2017 13:41:57 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7MDfuY2021761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:41:57 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:41:56 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-011.cisco.com ([64.101.220.151]) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com ([64.101.220.151]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:41:56 -0400
From: "Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <timjenki@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>, "andy@yumaworks.com" <andy@yumaworks.com>, "ludwig@clemm.org" <ludwig@clemm.org>
CC: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
Thread-Index: AQHTGsmvQpgXRYM8T0idt1h9zSemOqKQY40A
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:41:56 +0000
Message-ID: <EDD0A113-9964-4DE5-93C1-39A596373004@cisco.com>
References: <0BB5D437-8C0A-4E56-BE19-0FE027D57EB2@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <0BB5D437-8C0A-4E56-BE19-0FE027D57EB2@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.206]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EDD0A11399644DE593C139A596373004ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/HIhLr15Ca4GJMSibERmFZU7d6i8>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:42:03 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

--
Cisco Systems Canada Co.
2000 Innovation Drive
Kanata, ON, Canada, K2K 3E8
Preferences <http://www.cisco.com/offer/subscribe/?sid=000478326>
Unsubscribe <http://www.cisco.com/offer/unsubscribe/?sid=000478327>
Privacy <http://www.cisco.com/web/siteassets/legal/privacy.html>


From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
Date: Monday, August 21, 2017 at 6:06 PM
To: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>, "andy@yumaworks.com" <andy@yumaworks.com>, "ludwig@clemm.org" <ludwig@clemm.org>, "Tim Jenkins (timjenki)" <timjenki@cisco.com>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01

Authors,

As part of preparation for WG Adoption of "draft-voit-netconf-notification-messages-01", are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft?

Please state either:
    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"


If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:
    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.


If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.


If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware
of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For
more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Kent (and Mahesh)

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.