IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Regarding 108 adoption hums

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> Fri, 07 August 2020 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E983A0DFE for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mfygHNvmWN2j for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-edgeDD24.fraunhofer.de (mail-edgeDD24.fraunhofer.de [192.102.167.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E63423A10F3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 02:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2EeFABkpYde/xmnZsBmhGpvVS80hBGOeYFkLZlggWcKAQEBAQEBAQEBBgEBLQIEAQGERAKCRyQ4EwIQAQEGAQEBAQEFBAICaYVihkYBBSMVNhsLGAICJgICRxAGAQwIAQGDIoJ9BK9DgTKFS4NngT6BDiqMMQ+BTD+BOA+CWj6ENYMrgl4EkH+HIZhyB4FJd3wElh8jgjsBjHkFjEaPMpwdAgQCCQIVgWkjgVdNJE+Cak8YDZxnghuNGQGBDwEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2EeFABkpYde/xmnZsBmhGpvVS80hBGOeYFkLZlggWcKAQEBAQEBAQEBBgEBLQIEAQGERAKCRyQ4EwIQAQEGAQEBAQEFBAICaYVihkYBBSMVNhsLGAICJgICRxAGAQwIAQGDIoJ9BK9DgTKFS4NngT6BDiqMMQ+BTD+BOA+CWj6ENYMrgl4EkH+HIZhyB4FJd3wElh8jgjsBjHkFjEaPMpwdAgQCCQIVgWkjgVdNJE+Cak8YDZxnghuNGQGBDwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,341,1580770800"; d="scan'208";a="33483174"
Received: from mail-mtadd25.fraunhofer.de ([192.102.167.25]) by mail-edgeDD24.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2020 11:29:52 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CuGwAVHi1f/1lIDI1ggQmBTIE8AmpyVDA2hCqII4h0mhITgWkLAQMBAQEBAQYBAS0CBAEBhEwCgjUCJDwCDQIQAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FaIVyAQUjFTYbCxgCAiYCAkcQBgEMCAEBgyKDAbRegTKFUoNfgUCBDigDAYZNhj8PgUw/gTgPglo+hCSDMIJgBJJ7iB6aXykHgVuBCoEJBAuYbgUKHoJqAY5oBo4wkiufMAIEAgkCFYIBDIFXTSRPgmpPFwINnGhBaAIGCAEBAwl8jlQBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,445,1589234400"; d="scan'208";a="87794996"
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de ([141.12.72.89]) by mail-mtaDD25.fraunhofer.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2020 11:29:47 +0200
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (mail.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.171]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-10) with ESMTPS id 0779Tl8H010019 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:29:47 +0200
Received: from [192.168.16.50] (79.206.156.41) by mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (141.12.84.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:29:42 +0200
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Kent Watsen' <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, netconf@ietf.org
References: <01000173c0afb995-d6003a0a-edbd-4113-b3e6-9092d30ec2a7-000000@us-east-1.amazonses.com> <00cf01d66c99$07392530$15ab6f90$@olddog.co.uk> <ffc330c0-4ee0-a510-0d10-7ada6cf12565@sit.fraunhofer.de> <20200807091959.fywbuyfdifxb747k@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <d5e2800d-d311-7c62-f1e3-6fed737def47@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 11:29:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200807091959.fywbuyfdifxb747k@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [79.206.156.41]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/HtQeOI0YluUwiQJws4-mn_lbivs>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Regarding 108 adoption hums
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:30:48 -0000

Oh, and I fully agree with the quote below!

The scope and phrasing is what leaves me puzzled. An ask about concerns 
with the 3/5 results would be the thing I am expecting - not a reset.

On 07.08.20 11:19, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> I do
> not see anything wrong with asking the mailing list.
> 
> /js

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email