Re: [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-18

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Juergen,

Firstly, I’m beginning to think that my SMTP-client might be the source of the “garbling” we’ve been seeing in some off the text messages.  It was updated a couples weeks ago, and I’m still running the current version.  Checking “preferences”, I see that my “use same format from original message” setting was disabled - I just reenabled it.

More below.

K.



>> Ah, now I understand, you mean to remove the XML2RFC v3 b
> 
> Ah, its called an "aside". I am still reading plain-text but the
> question likely is what belongs into an aside box and what into
> text. For me, there is no reason to put this sentence into an 'aside'
> box - whatever the purpose of such a box is. Its just a regular
> sentence for me.
> 

From https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7991#section-2.6:

   "This element is a container for content that is semantically
    less important or tangential to the content that surrounds it.”

Is it okay to leave for the Copyeditor?


>> Yes, the diagrams would be a nice addition to an 8340bis.  Also, I don't know if you noticed, but the “Data Model Overview” section I created in all these drafts is highly mechanical…something that could be mostly automated…perhaps a good student project?  ;)
> 
> Students tend to do something half and then disappear. ;-) 

:laugh:


K.