Re: [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-18

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Wed, 21 April 2021 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <01000178f6b18c8b-1b707cda-9404-4617-9301-3fe6846fcad7-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BA33A3A7E; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWMoVb7eox48; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA28C3A3A7F; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1619046534; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=VsYETXGytmhYDSLJZV/Jo1d7F+3kyyiK0XCv5CMvbt8=; b=DSQI1XMCsLYq1+FFcs49laMuUvRqJHYIXpBLLaSTqmNjyOdqlc/aNuvN2wWQW+mf DWRZaKNB1YbI/58yUwo1oyUIMhrNgtjgwcVOZsXWRK3Ynf2tulTAQhdKROLlFXyFVW0 3ZVoxwTZj9yg3OKgDC1Ah1l8IrCnhPa9HXz7bA0Y=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <20210420123913.74ejllmgty5z2w6k@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:08:54 +0000
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, YANG Doctors <yang-doctors@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <01000178f6b18c8b-1b707cda-9404-4617-9301-3fe6846fcad7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <161045360252.14510.16755799701987783827@ietfa.amsl.com> <010001778e67638b-53d8c33f-82f6-4bda-881a-3cf881c06c95-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20210416115004.fqhitq6jofc6vjih@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <01000178ec7bfedf-5b8a2940-2fdd-42f5-ae43-27277d991769-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20210420123913.74ejllmgty5z2w6k@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.04.21-54.240.48.93
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/IF24acAb1LsAcpEVwU-8KnewDRk>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netconf-crypto-types-18
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:09:00 -0000

Hi Juergen,

Firstly, I’m beginning to think that my SMTP-client might be the source of the “garbling” we’ve been seeing in some off the text messages.  It was updated a couples weeks ago, and I’m still running the current version.  Checking “preferences”, I see that my “use same format from original message” setting was disabled - I just reenabled it.

More below.

K.



>> Ah, now I understand, you mean to remove the XML2RFC v3 b
> 
> Ah, its called an "aside". I am still reading plain-text but the
> question likely is what belongs into an aside box and what into
> text. For me, there is no reason to put this sentence into an 'aside'
> box - whatever the purpose of such a box is. Its just a regular
> sentence for me.
> 

From https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7991#section-2.6:

   "This element is a container for content that is semantically
    less important or tangential to the content that surrounds it.”

Is it okay to leave for the Copyeditor?


>> Yes, the diagrams would be a nice addition to an 8340bis.  Also, I don't know if you noticed, but the “Data Model Overview” section I created in all these drafts is highly mechanical…something that could be mostly automated…perhaps a good student project?  ;)
> 
> Students tend to do something half and then disappear. ;-) 

:laugh:


K.