IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] mbj's WGLC comments on netconf-event-notifications-08

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 12 June 2018 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381B6130DE3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GErxVtaNalBe for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B89031271FF for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5CKnTP9023566; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:53:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=69JNyZv0x5RdMwAiPPMEv+7lmm61P3y+Non9AHQMR4Y=; b=Y3aiW7fHvdZ7J09j0QtjKA92oZq8BSq5YkK23P1JRkoCTMYzFY09ywSaEegB+j13zQHm vQNNdNraXJtHPJRcMyOelxsWRFiKkVmT16zcCck+YLm/xDTplRK0+LYQ/9wASjc+60C8 wysGxmey9476x039GGUdP9DC1a/v5BN0OU9CbuavoyWKJ3wLuNIsIw+AzpTfHqrTmFhQ yUVin6DTURodToRXIh2tYhQABHI21zwoEjw9jb+MvoY6eyKG+YsStzgbw+uxi1WW+k7c CJe5eN8RwtX4rmQLUYx8/cx8UMdEwNRZ4ENzrWgwg6jRaxSMfsGKmI7kX1ntcARFbrot nw==
Received: from nam05-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam05lp0242.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.242]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jjn25r23c-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:53:32 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.200.153) by BYAPR05MB4392.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.202.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.863.6; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:53:31 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc]) by BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc%3]) with mapi id 15.20.0863.010; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:53:31 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "evoit@cisco.com" <evoit@cisco.com>
CC: "alex@clemm.org" <alex@clemm.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] mbj's WGLC comments on netconf-event-notifications-08
Thread-Index: AQHTvS8Qtjjviuo2Pk6xFqtd1RBQV6RW8p4AgAAfBYCABBszAIAAxY8AgAACvICAAWxIAA==
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:53:30 +0000
Message-ID: <29F98BF7-7601-4E63-BE6C-0F7A467F7BE6@juniper.net>
References: <0e6e711ab209437e881335756c268e07@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20180611.091248.42505202577647987.mbj@tail-f.com> <1291de8fc27f4ed6b7507b473e2a3394@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20180611.210941.1708247626405310220.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180611.210941.1708247626405310220.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB4392; 7:LkskB0XqUiuVWV5fWxON3bkY15onBqnZnVk5dDMDPfLDFUU/ovE8aQU77SKUzBBYkN466nYa3Dd7rrW7dqAT/rlA1wC+Ozbf2wMlMhM9J6xep5LNATCxIWIs995zMmbx1fkN2sGk4AAqBlBUFPWLmlVUeKlx5h0y6M6+Hh1SF8Aq3bWIyWVSIhkjZK+RI9s1XJBlUYu/3MhfTb6R4+0bnqV6CMVZYkhz62rZBkYQHUBlHd9uoNF0xZOcoDJ+SCuV
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4392;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4392:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB439208D4AB3F59A33158304BA57F0@BYAPR05MB4392.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(190756311086443)(100405760836317);
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4392; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4392;
x-forefront-prvs: 07013D7479
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39380400002)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(376002)(189003)(199004)(3280700002)(3660700001)(6512007)(106356001)(2900100001)(15650500001)(316002)(54906003)(305945005)(105586002)(82746002)(7736002)(58126008)(99286004)(83716003)(86362001)(81166006)(6246003)(53936002)(5660300001)(81156014)(6306002)(14454004)(6506007)(36756003)(26005)(102836004)(486006)(6486002)(476003)(8676002)(97736004)(11346002)(4326008)(66066001)(2616005)(186003)(93886005)(3846002)(2906002)(6436002)(966005)(2501003)(76176011)(33656002)(25786009)(5250100002)(229853002)(110136005)(6116002)(446003)(8936002)(68736007)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4392; H:BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: D+ucdybwq+RsG7JEt/rmXNvFmuj0t/MecvOzZSXBn8umBrFA9uURJgIqZdZpFh8A3mr+a0jwAy6vGjY1IwFHzat8ep6NmDa607z1A4IYcGeyKbFQ+IqAekLranSPs2f48NOxJ4kwJc1O02bGgdhTf6IdsP49LYHuQa9zuxyU8DjW+1+2gxR8vM6YUnZ5Zzjt
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <05C2EC4CEAD7CD4A9F94FACA71335A3D@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: c301490a-505a-4b53-2c3c-08d5d0a68e4e
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c301490a-505a-4b53-2c3c-08d5d0a68e4e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jun 2018 20:53:31.2648 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4392
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-06-12_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1805220000 definitions=main-1806120232
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/IFUhCAY-szUTLBesNYd5TO9Pvkk>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] mbj's WGLC comments on netconf-event-notifications-08
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:53:41 -0000

>>> Thanks.  I have some additional comments on this version, but I don't know if I
>>> should wait until you have published a new version or not.
>> 
>> Current version is at:
>> https://<ugly url inserted by my company's url-mangler removed/>
>>
>> I can post to IETF if it makes a difference to you.
>
> For me it doesn't really matter, except maybe it is easier for the WG
> if we have consistent versions of all three docs published.  What do
> the WG chairs say?

From yesterday in another thread:

  From a chair perspective, Mahesh and I observe that a lot of changes
  have occurred during this cycle.  Once the current threads have all
  been driven to ground, then we will want to ask the WG if they now
  think if the drafts are ready, which may trigger another last call.

The implication is that fresh updates would be submitted for all the
drafts and we'd run the normal process off them.

All, please be advised that Martin and I have invested significant time
getting these drafts into a passable state.  They are certainly more
readable than before.  We (the WG and chairs) look forward to reviews
from others in the next cycle to ensure we have a solid consensus to
move forward. Also, we're interested in hearing how best to rollout
the reviews, given that these are large documents and we got very 
little response last time.

Kent // as co-chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email