Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02

Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Wed, 08 August 2018 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D10A126CB6 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STgisgTWrt3i for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32095130DC6 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-80-27.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [212.85.80.27]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57C3D1AE018A; Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:58:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 08:58:12 +0200
Message-Id: <20180808.085812.1249848609556014485.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: mjethanandani@gmail.com
Cc: netconf@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <E26D8ABC-35DD-4DF6-BAF2-3A9E77BE5772@gmail.com>
References: <E26D8ABC-35DD-4DF6-BAF2-3A9E77BE5772@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/INADX-3TS0pFx9AUPhZURuIy68g>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG adoption poll for draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 06:58:18 -0000

Hi,

While I do support the adoption of this document, I wonder if this WG
really should add more work.  We have ~14 active drafts that we've
been working on for a very long time, and they are still not done,
mainly b/c of lack of reviews (which is due to the fact that the WG
have been busy with other docs).  I would prefer that the WG put some
effort into finishing the current set of documents before adopting new
work.

One techincal comment on this draft: I think it is necessary that it
lists nodes per datastore.  I know that in our implementation, we can
easily support on-change for all config true nodes in any conventional
configuration datastore, but it requires more work to support all
these nodes in operational.  I wouldn't be surprised if other
implementations are similar.



/martin


Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the NETCONF 102 WG meeting, authors presented the following document, and asked for WG adoption.
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lengyel-netconf-notification-capabilities-02>
> 
> This starts an adoption poll for the above draft. Please indicate your support or objection to the adoption poll. If objecting, please state your reasons by responding on this thread.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mahesh & Kent.
>