Re: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions? (was RE: LC on subscribed-notifications-10)

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Thu, 05 July 2018 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1891C130F4C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5LKiVRsxqNf for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A67D130F06 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w65IYEXE028486; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:41:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=D9PkJtCx3e6WMVW1wEvLuKIWwWJWHwQ3brCzYxVI87I=; b=x2bJqIxxn1VSJCjSzJGCn9XMK8imfSo/27SxvxjztEZmo8q/htKy2QdKWL7ss+QBl23g zm1SaHo+Nj80+8gjXm2fWfLSVgYAfnAcFrpkFKF/ArLe4fzSB9G26bAx3wx9QovF0SOm y3fEgSRlnh/7cZ2J2qHqmxpu31ESuo/5u0sAkeVNpsN99ST2Ndn2/4sSbfZ20SMSiW7T pXkXu9CMFN4ImYhj6vLG6CI0/6hwfhw0+3FNmxb+diH8cKFZJa6odbwWG3BHLYfa4IHs xNomYVaXwf4by+H/iAReoyy/rojOaAwMszafzO+7mBagbjNDpbESg7GqoXXkb9qcVaH0 lQ==
Received: from nam04-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam04lp0048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.48]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2k1mxugje2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 05 Jul 2018 11:41:37 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.200.153) by BYAPR05MB3944.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.195.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.930.17; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:41:36 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc]) by BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0930.016; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 18:41:36 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
CC: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions? (was RE: LC on subscribed-notifications-10)
Thread-Index: AQHUC7BkQt4kuIAVBU+dNFAZwz7Ja6Rw7V0QgABNWwCAC1wKgIABE+kAgAHboYCAAULQAIAAFuAAgAACY4CAABJBgIAAA4WA///NBYA=
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 18:41:36 +0000
Message-ID: <C6F8149F-A9CD-4A75-A32D-6C6DDDFADBD8@juniper.net>
References: <4df95162a0a8464b884c4e88268df8ca@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <DBD6B0CC-FE74-4C5A-A318-C96C8FBE11FE@sit.fraunhofer.de> <858F63BA-37A2-4925-B340-4DD79CEBEEF9@juniper.net> <CABCOCHTux6+pW=0xhPsgVKWqAr5uNKTNW-Qgv5CpV06Ki1hd-g@mail.gmail.com> <8c68a8ce85d946579f325e311a8e67a9@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <D9AB67AB-A0B2-4D04-8672-76B704800C86@juniper.net> <CABCOCHQjYHYomj1ES+0bH2pOaJZ4Wa_z3suQiJpASmDXP35teg@mail.gmail.com> <b202abf5-359e-ec1a-3251-9599924d4f4f@ericsson.com> <a8dfdce9e6c04721ab9e5cdb8534bc04@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <CABCOCHRQoRuX+=OtM50VHg8MCco65osCy=PWDHYuy_gvjNjEkA@mail.gmail.com> <b7c65965cf3b43e3b898c5c2f9519573@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <CABCOCHTfkNtBoXU7XMk3yxif1DXBH5m4QVP0YF1yPhHYJu0fKQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHTfkNtBoXU7XMk3yxif1DXBH5m4QVP0YF1yPhHYJu0fKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB3944; 7:koSKOF+rv54l7VUvjDNbNZaGqEsNBn6XtmBpq6UadP3Xt4uc5iUpX3fDcgYxF0jHCse+PJbjnnHJDhv9+pDEkeZ3OBBN3BC8M9clHovLdbb8tO5PADD+OTn9/Rwb9/L+XAOrzkZ4BrrgyVxuv7wQcx17rpQfa8dA1az7TxUZ7UbK5rfVmuKq6jsqzwPgN+fxBJZazTr/zB5NChncevL2ps/1jBS3fPszq8Z6jVADnP9824E/WnFoJUoThljPR/2n
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8516392c-ce33-4ac3-5a23-08d5e2a6f013
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989117)(5600053)(711020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB3944;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB3944:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB3944EE0593475D7CEEEC8D60A5400@BYAPR05MB3944.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(3231280)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR05MB3944; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB3944;
x-forefront-prvs: 0724FCD4CD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(7736002)(476003)(305945005)(6116002)(186003)(6486002)(486006)(3846002)(2900100001)(14454004)(6246003)(102836004)(6512007)(82746002)(76176011)(53936002)(256004)(6506007)(68736007)(36756003)(2616005)(26005)(6436002)(229853002)(5250100002)(11346002)(105586002)(106356001)(25786009)(446003)(66066001)(83716003)(8936002)(4326008)(93886005)(97736004)(99286004)(2906002)(54906003)(58126008)(81156014)(478600001)(316002)(5660300001)(6346003)(81166006)(110136005)(86362001)(8676002)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB3944; H:BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: +mS1GpIeJNKPngBJcsA8n2PdThSgLkLD+BteMt/0osLVPTisqzgBtcBzi3Mydf42q9EEL/7p25IVqudtJ7TW5LrDdgoyzp6G7WWxmyrfMFLg7x2GAYiILI/uxevHskXV471j1krxS7pCB1YH3aQS3yCCRcrZXx8sq8AYGzca5+ULOX+IO5mGcGjRmDtsz+rp9qhf9dk06CQHsrXuklcy85cSwi7toTOZSEH66KM7T7RsSPOEOZNScT+F7My01ki37oalInKu8h+fFNgkAmx/6YMMaVU7JBPcsfoX6jYWNSto3KQKDfMtepwiLgmYd4HJ33FX8LXvmLfOBT85fiBPU02QpfyYPpZDmYIYfN5OW2w=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <0ACDE0EF4C6F464CBEA9BA988AC0C679@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8516392c-ce33-4ac3-5a23-08d5e2a6f013
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jul 2018 18:41:36.1951 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB3944
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-07-05_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807050207
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/I_8gDv25h5J4DOvZo8haRRawSEg>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions? (was RE: LC on subscribed-notifications-10)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 18:41:46 -0000

>>> Why does there need to be a dependency on the client-server module?
>>> The only things missing from the "receiver" list are 2 leafs (host, port).
>>
>> <Eric>  This is what was there initially.   But several people have
>> asserted that host and port interacts poorly with call-home.   

The issue isn't call-home, per se, the issue is that a transport-independent
draft should leave all transport-specific details to the transport drafts.


> Of course it interacts poorly with CallHome, because the receiver list is
> used INSTEAD of CallHome, not with CallHome. CH is for initiating a new NC
> or RC session, so a "special" version of it that doesn't initiate a session
> would be a misuse.

I don't follow this comment.  For configured subscriptions, the device is
definitely initiating the underlying transport connection and, in the case
of NC/RC, we've determined that the ietf-*conf-server's call-home mechanism
is appropriate.


Kent // contributor