[netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server
Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 13 February 2025 01:06 UTC
Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BBAC1E6422 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:06:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDQ3XTCXfX9M for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB309C1E641E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-220c665ef4cso3715185ad.3 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1739408760; x=1740013560; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GpznROct0hdVCFMyYYga+8TVujbs8EaGSynEne8f/ck=; b=WMNy8i/VfAds6wIZCz9dK5Q6fVFVoq+bgmsQ2pqRpjjYwqktjNQn5fgPcRz3Id4mCu ag7yX+Hqn6iHma6nL61PdhDhKzNzSvWLhohZT3duAVHz/paFgYRQT/UQV46hFCWUgYy3 ee1inY9ezZ/ep17+J/IY4QM7Mk/OdjOjUVBuYeZjPtpglxLA5o/FOhzCsdD8Ghh6/6nz ykvHVxLwaDxrNiKxVP0CRSN+MnQW999wdqKGOzMHPYA1ok9zgUjLFaBxu/ZPg3UBJReD BJUjdrTLAlBJZP3EdhaBkEjbVxRED3wiGU1KEHvs/pDTdE2iqMpDXDPpMqET4qxDrsca dRrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1739408760; x=1740013560; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GpznROct0hdVCFMyYYga+8TVujbs8EaGSynEne8f/ck=; b=c9+fkUZQxU4oFxJGB+jyYo9CZzpRrGHgsqUTt8tLwDx7TKpMa039hL3lffJKD7BRLz sw8y2gb7J9dsoSWVUPxUFQM8e8cV50OdjDzIr+t9usJbAMkK5D/T7GuRIFw8J8lPa6LC MmjeWCbdRAJ16NxaIkOYmykOsizJyA4MdHtlgGL/e8+ju0UHWGK4OYAjb0IXb9TlBADM 4htappespN2YItjxUvhAS5PlkwnXmHqDF+RN6+PPWkdi27jLFrOWcR0tCyvk6EJVtWAp uTXezK+luCWwTeJCVw9e7SwuKDFyJBs7cDPR+Hn4A8XQLBpid8mkbolI5NQ2/6G0XRD2 VnUw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXW1sHqLMEXqAl5IuU4xJ9VoGdoeOOSNK19SA12uVmQXq4MZBuenLnuQWOvDW+Rh2/QqhK0FaqD@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzDqn5jlFa+LPX3R4/qAkr+x3nNRJnifiYB6Rgy/MZfoedmSfyf 2gV3ou3hUtT5yrh+6LIPKqu1Q/l+UyATMWLkfmiPnaJ9CY+0XN2v2GHqeg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctToP2D07IeISBH6Tl9X+WrJn8XXQZY8pFv+Rbh1m5StsQvN4Ys9XFiiQQHXrC E/tt12tUJ1kOjbPdSN5vRctcqHNBEaWEHfc7nbiTFy02FI3cCRGAXyZO0l3eZG03VHAg2t97pgD j3F3HaOI713BMG9hTo99urXKOmKB1hTO6l+CTjpTtL/4ndYaseLHSrCyO0Bh+YSt718SRNKSOPz z0dssqMxBRdhCumAghT9F8O1VLkIGYNmyPjDF+cxPKG8kMfuciqgvX0B2eenHxsIkWM/NL73We+ C6uZQw+1elL01TJblrH45+5ztbraDGOeNkP4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHjyuFyBSl/9+LGJVwaCPALiywlW7A3U9yABPH4UFhQuNDQpcBppWUMwsoV0/hx186J2jW7SA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:c998:b0:1ee:1e05:206d with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1ee5e5b7c8amr8886491637.21.1739408760188; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([38.99.102.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-7324276175fsm76365b3a.143.2025.02.12.17.05.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:05:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <74F8897D-1EEC-40E2-A0AA-F3BEC0CBAA74@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7AAB56B3-C34B-410F-9628-880B3F0DA82C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:05:58 -0800
In-Reply-To: <d37c7ced-1d11-4a66-b4a5-58b66eabfe5c@huawei.com>
To: Benoit Claise <benoit.claise=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CACvbXWHPpF8KxOmScJNTeo5ghOCDiLWKyKCKLSM+DBeaeS7T=Q@mail.gmail.com> <ZR1P278MB11702D20500AB9B64D6DA51789FC2@ZR1P278MB1170.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <d37c7ced-1d11-4a66-b4a5-58b66eabfe5c@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Message-ID-Hash: RGBVIIJUXX2HWPKHD6IVKVXQOU3ORRNY
X-Message-ID-Hash: RGBVIIJUXX2HWPKHD6IVKVXQOU3ORRNY
X-MailFrom: mjethanandani@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netconf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com, NETCONF WG <netconf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/JD8NNDPmhoLCFM0PZKKzQUokDYk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netconf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netconf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netconf-leave@ietf.org>
+1 on the comment about consistency. > On Feb 12, 2025, at 12:49 AM, Benoit Claise <benoit.claise=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I believe that this document is ready. > > > There is no reference to NMDA compliance in this doc., which is typical statement for YANG modules. > I don't know whether this is (still) imposed by the YANG doctors and AD. > Now, this document only contains grouping, so it's a special one. > I took a recent example "YANG Groupings for TCP Clients and TCP servers". https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9643.html#name-adherence-to-the-nmda > Consistency might be a plus. > > Regards, Benoit > > > On 2/12/2025 7:17 AM, Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com wrote: >> Dear NETCONF wg and udp-client-server authors, >> >> Thanks a lot. I reviewed the document and have not found anything to comment on. >> >> The document is in perfect shape ready to move forward to IESG. >> >> I volunteer to do the document shepherding. >> >> Best wishes >> Thomas >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Per Andersson <per.ietf@ionio.se> >> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 4:39 PM >> To: netconf@ietf.org >> Subject: [netconf] WGLC for udp-client-server >> >> >> Be aware: This is an external email. >> >> >> >> Hi! >> >> This email begins a two-week WGLC on: >> >> YANG Groupings for UDP Clients and UDP Servers >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-udp-client-server-05 >> >> Please take time to review this draft and post comments by February 20. Favorable comments are especially welcomed. >> >> None of the authors or contributors have declared IPR: >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/NncA8JHqZH14wCptMhktgGcngyM/ >> >> >> -- >> Per, co-chair >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netconf mailing list -- netconf@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to netconf-leave@ietf.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netconf mailing list -- netconf@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to netconf-leave@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > netconf mailing list -- netconf@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to netconf-leave@ietf.org Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com
- [netconf] WGLC for udp-client-server Per Andersson
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Benoit Claise
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Mahesh Jethanandani
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Andy Bierman
- [netconf] NMDA statement (was RE: Re: WGLC for ud… mohamed.boucadair
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Alex Huang Feng
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Thomas.Graf
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Alex Huang Feng
- [netconf] Re: WGLC for udp-client-server Per Andersson