[netconf] [IANA #1373109] expert review for draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server (xml-registry)

[Amanda Baber via RT <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tim, Martin,

Would you have a chance to double-check this one before Thursday? It's on this week's telechat agenda.

thanks,
Amanda

On Wed Apr 09 00:59:21 2025, amanda.baber wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> Can you confirm that the current version of this document is still OK?
> It looks like you reviewed -38, and there are changes in the XML:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-
> client-server
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Mon Sep 02 01:20:45 2024, [e-mail] wrote:
> > I see no problems, aside from YANG’s usual and regrettable use of
> > namespace prefixes in text content, which means that it will not work
> > unless the XML processor being used supports this nonstandard
> > exception.
> > For example, <map-type>x509c2n:specified</map-type>
> >
> > I know that this is a common idiom in YANG and is unlikely to cause
> > real-world problems, but I wish they wouldn’t do it.
> >
> > On Aug 30, 2024 at 4:46:48 PM, David Dong via RT <
> > [e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Martin Thomson, Tim Bray (cc: netconf WG),
> > >
> > > As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the
> > > proposed
> > > registration in draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-38 for
> > > us?
> > > Please
> > > see:
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-
> > > client-
> > > server/
> > >
> > > The due date is September 13th.
> > >
> > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
> > > we'll
> > > make the registration at:
> > >
> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/
> > >
> > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the
> > > first
> > > response we receive.
> > >
> > > With thanks,
> > >
> > > David Dong
> > > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> > >