IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] I-D Action: draft-wu-netconf-restconf-factory-restore-00.txt

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Thu, 28 June 2018 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D7E130FA0 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 03:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jnXE99LrR5_J for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 03:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anna.localdomain (firewallix.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.247]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D11130EA4 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 03:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6882622B7671; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:05:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 12:05:59 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
Cc: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180628100559.euc3tnnznfv6sw5d@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Rohit R Ranade <rohitrranade@huawei.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEB9E31@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <991B70D8B4112A4699D5C00DDBBF878A6BBC56D4@dggeml510-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEBA241@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AEBA241@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180622
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/KJM-XJyDrnyILAqwj6d2jhj5BoE>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] I-D Action: draft-wu-netconf-restconf-factory-restore-00.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:06:14 -0000

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:42:20AM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
> 
> 1.  I feel it is better if all the datastores used for source / target should be datastore-ref used from ietf-datastore module 
> [Qin]: Sounds good point, but the datastores used for source / target aligns with ones defined in RFC6241, shall we align with RFC6241 or RFC8342?
> 
> 2.  I think the factory-restore may be helpful for the ephemeral data-stores, if they want to revert the configurations (without a reboot).
> [Qin]: Yes, factory-restore operation can help ephemeral datastore to revert the configuration to factory default setting without reboot or restart.
> We can add ephemeral as target in the model.
>

There is no defined ephemeral datastore. If you use datastore-ref, the
issue is likely resolved and also future proof.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email