IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] IETF #98 Sessions and Discussions in other WGs related to planned work in NETCONF WG

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 23 March 2017 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08281294EF for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eo5iNrLt0lE3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DE211294F8 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u132so70747147wmg.0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jCcanahf8eyABEUgJ+SO2NX62h9hW5ux08LUYq5bNXU=; b=shKJYKcZdnoUIf+4v8FaxKwmne7lfUH8xhsgx6ZD79s+LoiuCnlhJSODniHxVD7fCQ sH7fu2G9RHk8jqIy/hRDOnQMZtrxOk+zixQ3chXpeqAFnWW63sgAvk5HRzuvEtdgTFSF Tsx7Hqv7dWea6NLEep8BRFZT/dg2t3LThPAmR/s1oBwa1klFQwS52cFeisUuhfC2t5Gp BomzqjGMZbOOnV/1yMskxIBiHjUePuQBseQmVeqGkTjBcrw957w752XNpViK0RTb7WQe EOtI1K5JziQ7uSguqbSTzlWv64fKHJzejKW/PqAXhhfcnlhMImr4ilwyTEqTXHqSObyH i57A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jCcanahf8eyABEUgJ+SO2NX62h9hW5ux08LUYq5bNXU=; b=Cvryhbc3afyz5xe6Y4IAM+k1irWtdPGLOMWDzSjinjGUbEpuxYbkidJTVqkSBC2jtV khjA1iElqUZXcapSJJPSS+HONONwviofB7qConptaCJeidWqiPsa6bSySvNndIrQDmYf Nf1C4hsL6mv82o9KwqMj8iKFi8Y0cdqqXKe4oZRQCwHJsKmqUP+akLgCasBMuoP/W0gf HSSDYGH3OAz1csiQuxORELOOVxt0BLlV1NSy6U8uY9VNOTgszkoeBq3Q4ogHFF0Zfk+G XlwKUEYaaZNZhFAB26zNjNDstrtqNgCYBsIWOVNcAZ3USfkBJ1cA8krC0IQmg19J4+bs edOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3jlblYwIHqbsI3r0o/8DEA2I/BZoGQOWp6RPbgIXUNPk5XovaYVZQCupb6Yno1Qy1+BEiYOxotjIZTsg==
X-Received: by 10.28.46.213 with SMTP id u204mr4397715wmu.136.1490299571766; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.166.37 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9C19BFCA-806E-40F4-BDDA-0CC7B75C59B8@tzi.org>
References: <029a01d2a40c$9b79f6b0$d26de410$@gmail.com> <9C19BFCA-806E-40F4-BDDA-0CC7B75C59B8@tzi.org>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:06:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHSXr0XwPSQ379dPMt2YazLfgm0p3r5zLqAkNvxpeeE9Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11497ace95abc6054b6b68dd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/KTr5Q6q2CRk5kt_tpFLaIH0Le5Q>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] IETF #98 Sessions and Discussions in other WGs related to planned work in NETCONF WG
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:06:16 -0000

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> … and if you care about managing constrained devices:
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>
>
>
> Core@IETF98 0.1 drafty agenda
>
> # TUESDAY, March 28, 2017
>
> 1300-1430  Afternoon Session I: Zurich C
>
> [40 min skipped]
>
> ## comi (20)
>
> * Discuss results from Monday's 15:20 to 16:50 semi-formal COMI meeting
>
>
I was going to send an announcement about this unofficial bar bof...
Originally it was a semi-private meeting with YANG doctors and co-authors
of the CoMI/SID drafts.

We will try to get a meeting room for Monday 15:20 - 16:50, or use the
hotel bar if that is not possible.  The focus of the meeting is
YANG-to-CBOR and SID.
We would like to get as many YANG expert reviews as possible for these
2 drafts.

IMO this binary representation of YANG data is useful for RESTCONF in
general,
not just CoAP. (It is not chartered that way, but expectations are high ;-)


Andy




> Objective: Which of these can we WGLC now?
> Where are we with installing a SID process with IANA and other actors
> needed?
> [SID] Check status of IANA processes (register SIDs, lookup SIDs).
>
> * draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor -04   2017-02-07
> * draft-ietf-core-comi -00   2017-01-26
> * draft-ietf-core-sid -00   2016-10-26
>
> Objective: what are the next steps?  (Based on results from Monday:)
>
> * draft-veillette-core-yang-library -00   2017-01-31
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email