Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> (YANG Library) to Proposed Standard

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Mon, 30 July 2018 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587BC124D68; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Qt218JUlh2V; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8578D130DEE; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id x5-v6so7828226pgp.7; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kzYzW6f1DLqVf0Rb3BEJDTqZjdkfh0ktE6ODzWsHBIY=; b=MIUkzgRiyQTIXOwJX4GcKp+oEh+Y9vpsJIi+yRRBC2Iq2usXq4iN2hjGdX82ruU8qk xG6oscvYqxWEu6UXzMr5RA1ShnmhZh/Cw1yFmO0UlwUbwYvZM5pIuKkcX8nkeQ9/qCGL MgBKmNKwZT2j4y1ZNAEww+sxSBxxggk5IC9OB27Q/43wmRFmWMoMRLOIXWKv6HCxboDV +RvfoWElm983yHoH35wTDtML6/X1VQwisRNTuCf5jndqYnja5MgNwWV+J/wtuzGusICd mrkSwXeksr+3MMrmC1/lzwR2pNr55LqW/Jc9yaYaoAbOWs5QxpzqfDGPjhSR75oTtPZo XWIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kzYzW6f1DLqVf0Rb3BEJDTqZjdkfh0ktE6ODzWsHBIY=; b=ALPbNy7YueMrNubQ2vTzSPwNotoRKKxjWVpyF2mUB0lUvOF9FCgo0Le0ZJ8PF8e4pX fGqOU6CsDjJC9U5AZvhdKhmIE0irn4x/YqvcRTpSl+a4FX6vJFZLSYpqppfsfq24cdHG ybInnIn2/TIvkVTTmOmjfTNVqgiJ+wT4vx5qj81oUEbM9U1uUm52CIoUajmsewV454kh g/M0A9MUK6tG7rTXWprjUnzMwabgnAhWZwtJbCMp4/WRH4yrTJdp9O8fcrakPTAsLE/+ Dtq44rxwjuwPK2LOCT5QP/4sK1byxQaIahwacHgUBuA2eon6di4pjdPCE81xrFnmH6mR Z2VQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF2mdyW4qnRqJIRVMO+tFmfHYX4sZQBcJ+8mOn94t6gWmOcXvwi Ar6YI/r+w2LYlu+xHNIe0KM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfL7aqn0W4lvPi1ARX/wrtMwauda/iPZtTQDurN1Nzk0P1uNv8wO9ng3ZfDTrclEpAUHasIoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:4a41:: with SMTP id x62-v6mr19316069pfa.45.1532981438075; Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4700:1280:3c4e:5eef:2001:c4eb? ([2601:647:4700:1280:3c4e:5eef:2001:c4eb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s73-v6sm22041807pfi.154.2018.07.30.13.10.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9ad91163-ca97-5db1-1f6d-e365f819db10@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 13:10:35 -0700
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>, netconf-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis@ietf.org, netconf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5363EB75-95BC-4407-9BFA-3D97EAC440D3@gmail.com>
References: <152899335818.26447.7759890925422555917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9ad91163-ca97-5db1-1f6d-e365f819db10@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/KvfTDwiyu_FmlEWOo389z1pyBJY>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> (YANG Library) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 20:10:41 -0000

Hi Lou,

> On Jul 30, 2018, at 10:01 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>     I have a late comment on this document that I discovered while reviewing draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf.  Sorry about the timing, but better to make the comment now rather then as an errata...
> 
> This document says:
>    All NETCONF servers supporting YANG 1.1 [RFC7950] are required to
>    support YANG Library (see Section 5.6.4 of RFC 7950).  NETCONF
>    servers implementing the NETCONF extensions to support the NMDA
>    [I-D.ietf-netconf-nmda-netconf] MUST implement at least the version
>    of the YANG library defined in this document.  Similarly, all
>    RESTCONF servers are required to support YANG Library (see Section 10
>    of RFC 8040).  RESTCONF servers implementing the RESTCONF extensions
>    to support the NMDA [I-D.ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf] MUST implement
>    at least the version of the YANG library defined in this document.
> 
> I read this as an  update to RFC7950 and this should be noted in the document header, the abstract and Intro.

Your read of the update to RFC7950 is that it should now reference rfc7895bis in Section 5.6.4. Is that correct? How is that different from 7895bis obsoleting 7895, and thus all references to 7895 should now be to 7895bis?

> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> On 6/14/2018 12:22 PM, The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has received a request from the Network Configuration WG (netconf)
>> to consider the following document: - 'YANG Library'
>>   <draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06.txt> as Proposed Standard
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
>> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-06-28. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
>> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> Abstract
>> 
>> 
>>    This document describes a YANG library that provides information
>>    about the YANG modules, datastores, and datastore schemas used by a
>>    network management server.  Simple caching mechanisms are provided to
>>    allow clients to minimize retrieval of this information.  This
>>    version of the YANG library supports the Network Management Datastore
>>    Architecture by listing all datastores supported by a network
>>    management server and the schema that is used by each of these
>>    datastores.
>> 
>>    This document obsoletes RFC 7895.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis/
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis/ballot/
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>> 
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com