IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Netconf] a joint discussion on dynamic subscription

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Wed, 13 June 2018 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A70126DBF for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NqsF8JzXZcqh for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F10130DD2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id BE008100703 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 04:47:33 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 04:47:34 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:47:26 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Eric Voit <evoit@cisco.com>, Alexander Clemm <alexander.clemm@huawei.com>, "Zhengguangying (Walker)" <zhengguangying@huawei.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: a joint discussion on dynamic subscription
Thread-Index: AdQCx01ede4gaRHPTgG2WyMdkd0r2g==
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 03:47:26 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21B55CCDB7@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/LJTMwRc2lWiDWtyjyuMxLkEX3Kw>
Subject: [Netconf] a joint discussion on dynamic subscription
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 03:47:39 -0000

Hi Eric,

When we are discussing the draft-ietf-netconf-udp-pub-channel, we find a conflict with current dynamic subscription design.
1. The dynamic subscription requires notification to use the same channel as the subscription.
2. The RPC does not have the input information about the receiver because the above assumption.

However, when we talk about the distributed data collection (multi data originators), the publication channel is always different from the subscription channel.
So either the distributed data collection does not support dynamic subscription, or current dynamic subscription definition may need modification.

What's your thoughts?

Regards,
Tianran

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email